FediTips (@feditips@mstdn.social)
mstdn.social
Content warning: Please don't use Lemmy :( Human rights, oppression

Please don’t put any hate comments against the developers of lemmy or against the person who posted this.

I am also unhappy about what the main lemmy instance is doing.

What are your thoughts?

  • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
    3•3 years ago

    You’re just playing word games here. Insufficient evidence means there is no ground to claim that there is a genocide happening. This is coming from the lawyers of a country that’s actively pushing the genocide narrative. If you bothered looking at my follow up comment, I provide a lot more evidence to support what I’m saying.

      • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
        4•3 years ago

        Nobody is changing any meanings here or gaslighting you. Insufficient evidence literally means that they do not have evidence. You’re the one changing definitions here while accusing others of lying. There has to be a positive proof of something happening, otherwise you’re just asking to prove a negative. It’s quite obvious that you do in fact want to play word games here.

          • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
            4•3 years ago

            You just keep repeating the same thing over and over here. You’re also conveniently ignoring my follow up comment that provides a lot more context and sources other than US such as the recent report from Italy stating that the narrative is politically motivated.

              • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
                4•3 years ago

                The follow up comment clearly shows that the claims of genocide are not credible. Meanwhile, US state department is hardly a neutral actor here. My only point in the original comment was that even they, despite their clear desire to call it a genocide, are not able to do so. You’re working overtime to not understand this.

                  • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
                    3•3 years ago

                    I was using language symmetric to the parent comment as a rhetorical tool. US state department very clearly states that there is insufficient evidence for claims of genocide. That’s denying the claim being made.

                    They say they are unable to prove it is genocide, not that they are unable to claim it is genocide.

                    Not being able to prove it is genocide literally means that they’re unable to claim that it is. It’s absolutely surreal that you keep twisting that into something other than what it is. Claims of genocide need positive proof.

                  • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
                    3•3 years ago

                    You just keep repeating yourself like a broken record here. And you’re right it really shouldn’t be hard for you to understand what I said, yet you choose not to. Claims of genocide without proof are meaningless. Have a good day.

                  • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
                    1•3 years ago

                    In order to say something is happening you have to be able to prove it. This is the only thing that shouldn’t be hard to udnerstand here.