Google’s 16 years of messenger wheel-spinning has allowed products from more focused companies to pass it by. Embarrassingly, nearly all of these products are much younger than Google’s messaging efforts. Consider competitors like WhatsApp (12 years old), Facebook Messenger (nine years old), iMessage (nine years old), and Slack (eight years old)—Google Talk even had video chat four years before Zoom was a thing.

Currently, you would probably rank Google’s offerings behind every other big-tech competitor. A lack of any kind of top-down messaging leadership at Google has led to a decade and a half of messaging purgatory, with Google both unable to leave the space altogether and unable to commit to a single product. While companies like Facebook and Salesforce invest tens of billions of dollars into a lone messaging app, Google seems content only to spin up an innumerable number of under-funded, unstable side projects led by job-hopping project managers.

Because no single company has ever failed at something this badly, for this long, with this many different products (and because it has barely been a month since the rollout of Google Chat), the time has come to outline the history of Google messaging. Prepare yourselves, dear readers, for a non-stop rollercoaster of new product launches, neglected established products, unexpected shut-downs, and legions of confused, frustrated, and exiled users.

In the beginning, there was Google Talk, and things were good…

See https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2021/08/a-decade-and-a-half-of-instability-the-history-of-google-messaging-apps/

#technology #Google #messengers

  • @OsrsNeedsF2P
    link
    13 years ago

    I always find this website redundant. Most ideas fail. It would make sense that big companies want to keep their new ideas going, since they don’t have to worry about funding to see it through. So it makes sense that Google would have a bunch of products that failed.

    • Helix 🧬
      link
      fedilink
      33 years ago

      yeah but they killed products which didn’t fail as well. They should’ve open sourced some of it at least. Especially their social networks (Google+, Orkut) were pretty innovative and useful. Some features of the cancelled products were used by competitors and the users liked that.