• nutomicOPA
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 years ago

    You’re setting a pretty high bar for a country that has been occupied for 20 years. Before there can be emancipation, they need peace.

    • nikifa
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 years ago

      Taliban existed prior to the US invasion. They rose in power after the invasion of the UdSSR. Obviously they gained even more momentum “thanks” to the US invasion.

      • nikifa
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 years ago

        Before there can be emancipation, they need peace.

        There is no peace without emancipation. Asymmetrical warfare, is still warfare.

        • nikifa
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 years ago

          also if the only solution for Afghanistan you can think of is nationalism, or pan-nationalism you set the bar extremly low.

        • nikifa
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          3 years ago

          Before there can be emancipation, they need peace.

          What you’re saying is basically that women must surrender to have peace in Afghanistan. That is utterly disgusting.

          • nutomicOPA
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 years ago

            Thats not at all what i’m saying, so dont put any words in my mouth.

            • nikifa
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              3 years ago

              It is the logical conclusion of the strategy you propose, imho.

              “Before there can be emancipation, they need peace.”

              See: Taliban are at an asymmetrical warfare against women. Women can either fight for emaciation or surrender. Taking an opposing position towards an enemy that targets you by asymmetrical warfare is contrary to peace. You suggest that peace must come before emaciation. That can only mean, women should surrender to the Taliban.

              If you mean something else, please explain.

              • poVoq
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                2 years ago

                deleted by creator

                • ancom
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  3 years ago

                  Every women that picked up a gun to defend themselves and to defend their sisters is a counter argument to your “women rights after the revolution”

                  • poVoq
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    2 years ago

                    deleted by creator