@markus99@lemmy.world to Linux • 5 months agoLinux reaches new high 3.82%gs.statcounter.commessage-square268fedilinkarrow-up1863arrow-down117cross-posted to: linux_gaming@lemmy.worldlinuxlinux_gamingtechnology@lemmy.worldlinux_gaming@lemmy.worldlinux_gaminglinuxlinux@discuss.tchncs.delinux_gaming
arrow-up1846arrow-down1external-linkLinux reaches new high 3.82%gs.statcounter.com@markus99@lemmy.world to Linux • 5 months agomessage-square268fedilinkcross-posted to: linux_gaming@lemmy.worldlinuxlinux_gamingtechnology@lemmy.worldlinux_gaming@lemmy.worldlinux_gaminglinuxlinux@discuss.tchncs.delinux_gaming
minus-square@Patch@feddit.uklinkfedilink1•5 months agoChromeOS can run native Linux apps, so realistically if Adobe wanted to support ChromeOS they’d probably go for a Linux port anyway. A lot less work than trying to reimplement every single UI from the ground up as a web interface.
minus-square@Spectacle8011@lemmy.comfysnug.spacelinkfedilink1•5 months agoSo you’d think, but why else would Adobe bother developing a web version of Photoshop? Good to know, though. Obviously it defeats piracy, but that argument doesn’t make sense if Adobe is still shipping a native version of Photoshop.
ChromeOS can run native Linux apps, so realistically if Adobe wanted to support ChromeOS they’d probably go for a Linux port anyway. A lot less work than trying to reimplement every single UI from the ground up as a web interface.
So you’d think, but why else would Adobe bother developing a web version of Photoshop? Good to know, though.
Obviously it defeats piracy, but that argument doesn’t make sense if Adobe is still shipping a native version of Photoshop.