The containerized model for Android and iOS apps is very secure, much more so than desktop where any software has full access to at least your user directory without needing any explicit user permissions.
The problem comes from proprietary operating systems and proprietary apps, which by definition cannot be trusted for privacy or security (not saying open source is automatically secure or private, but it’s at least possible to externally audit them). In this regard, Apple is likely worse than an AOSP based Android ROM without any Google Apps. However, I’d wager that the Android that comes with most phones is worse than iOS, because those have the Google Services Framework installed, and Google is pretty much the king of stepping all over user privacy.
I do not agree with this, Win10 has a Sandbox system that prevents soft access to sensitive files on the system and to certain folders only with authorization. All saved passwords are encrypted in a second protection ring, this is what, for example, Linux does not do. W10 even protects against RootKits with additional and available measures which can improve more security, which do not exist on Android or iOS.
FOSS certainly has some advantages over proprietary OS and soft, but privacy and security are not necessarily among them.
Saying that mobiles are safer than a PC is absolutely false.
Windows has many objectionable points, but since it is the most used OS it is also the OS most attacked by all types of malware and therefore also the OS with the most experience in defending these attacks. Not so in Linux or MacOS, always only a secondary target and for this reason believing more secure, but this is changing and for Linux there is not even an AV that deserves this name and less other additional protections.
Whether an app is FOSS or not is irrelevant, the only protection the user has is to read TOS and PP of the product, this is what nobody does (All APIs of Google, Alphabet Inc, Amazon, Facebook and others, are FOSS and included in a lot of other FOSS apps)
Yes, indeed, f.Exmpl. the lack of Windows is that they spy the user, but on the other hand if you know this, you can diseable this in the own settings. Although some options are quite hidden and are not directly accessible.
But in other soft from small companies or individuals, the privacy is generally quite good, although the product is not FOSS.
For Exmpl the famous Irfanview (Freeware) or one of my favorite online services SSuite (Freeware), which has a TOS and PP that I like also for others (the shortest I know).
In OS Linux generally has a good privacy, but the security isn’t so good, unlike Windows, where privacy is not strong (but you can improve it) , but it is nevertheless perhaps one of the safest OS currently.
The containerized model for Android and iOS apps is very secure, much more so than desktop where any software has full access to at least your user directory without needing any explicit user permissions.
The problem comes from proprietary operating systems and proprietary apps, which by definition cannot be trusted for privacy or security (not saying open source is automatically secure or private, but it’s at least possible to externally audit them). In this regard, Apple is likely worse than an AOSP based Android ROM without any Google Apps. However, I’d wager that the Android that comes with most phones is worse than iOS, because those have the Google Services Framework installed, and Google is pretty much the king of stepping all over user privacy.
I do not agree with this, Win10 has a Sandbox system that prevents soft access to sensitive files on the system and to certain folders only with authorization. All saved passwords are encrypted in a second protection ring, this is what, for example, Linux does not do. W10 even protects against RootKits with additional and available measures which can improve more security, which do not exist on Android or iOS. FOSS certainly has some advantages over proprietary OS and soft, but privacy and security are not necessarily among them. Saying that mobiles are safer than a PC is absolutely false.
Windows has many objectionable points, but since it is the most used OS it is also the OS most attacked by all types of malware and therefore also the OS with the most experience in defending these attacks. Not so in Linux or MacOS, always only a secondary target and for this reason believing more secure, but this is changing and for Linux there is not even an AV that deserves this name and less other additional protections.
Whether an app is FOSS or not is irrelevant, the only protection the user has is to read TOS and PP of the product, this is what nobody does (All APIs of Google, Alphabet Inc, Amazon, Facebook and others, are FOSS and included in a lot of other FOSS apps)
The big tech companies have been caught lying on their privacy policy and always got off scott free.
Yes, indeed, f.Exmpl. the lack of Windows is that they spy the user, but on the other hand if you know this, you can diseable this in the own settings. Although some options are quite hidden and are not directly accessible. But in other soft from small companies or individuals, the privacy is generally quite good, although the product is not FOSS. For Exmpl the famous Irfanview (Freeware) or one of my favorite online services SSuite (Freeware), which has a TOS and PP that I like also for others (the shortest I know). In OS Linux generally has a good privacy, but the security isn’t so good, unlike Windows, where privacy is not strong (but you can improve it) , but it is nevertheless perhaps one of the safest OS currently.