• Ukraine says it has liberated four villages in the south-east, calling these the first settlements won back from Russia since Kyiv’s counter-offensive began
  • On Monday morning, officials reported that “the national flag is once again waving” over Storozhove, in the Donetsk region
  • A day earlier, footage showed Ukrainian troops celebrating in Blahodatne and Neskuchne - and a minister said nearby Makarivka was also taken
  • The settlements are relatively small - and Moscow is yet to confirm any retreat
  • The Institute for the Study of War backs up Kyiv’s claims, saying Ukraine captured “multiple settlements” along the frontline over the weekend
  • On Saturday, President Zelensky acknowledged that the long-awaited counter-offensive was under way
  • Flinch
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    the thing you bloodthirsty redditors don’t understand is, the only correct position on this war is hoping it ends as soon as possible. I hope peace talks can be established, and we can all move past this with as few people as possible being shoved into the woodchipper. I am not pro russia, and I’m certainly not pro ukraine. The only correct position is anti war, anything less is baying for blood.

    • pingveno
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I have little trust that an “end” that leaves Russia occupying a large portion of Ukraine will last. It’s a message to Russia’s leadership that invasions will be rewarded. First Georgia, then Crimea, then Ukraine more broadly. Make some allegations about a Russian minority being persecuted and it’s time to roll in the tanks! That’s probably a large reason why Europe has been willing to arm Ukraine to the teeth: to send a message that the West is serious this time after wimping out in the case of Georgia and Crimea.

      • freagle@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s literally how we got here. Russia has been appeasing NATO as it deploys nuclear capabilities on it’s border in many countries. This most recent move by NATO, under US direction, to establish nuclear capabilities on the Ukraine border could no longer be managed through appeasement and diplomacy. It’s not like Russia hasn’t tried, it’s not like the US didn’t know Ukraine was a red line for Russian national security. Russia has been appeasing US nuclear expansion for decades, and slowly demonstrating their willingness to fight back. Now they’re in a proxy conflict where the US is pumping Ukraine full of the equipment Ukraine needs to send out soldiers. If the US hadn’t done that, Ukraine would have far more people still alive and would have capitulated far earlier and begun negotiations. This is the same pattern we see every time the US pumps up a proxy, the proxy suffers the most.

        • pingveno
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Then have nuclear weapon deployment forbidden in Ukraine as part of a peace treaty? That isn’t a complex problem to solve. The Baltic NATO countries already follow a no-nukes policy. Russia always seems to equate NATO membership with inevitable nuclear silos, but that’s doesn’t hold up to even the slightest scrutiny. Quite the opposite. While there are NATO countries in Europe with nuclear weapons, none border Russia.

    • Rickety Thudds@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You aren’t leaving room for those who view Russia as a bad faith actor, in light of their false flag operations and overall reunification goals.

      Posit: It’s not as if they’re open to a peace deal that rules out their ability to start another “special operation”.

      Therefore, the anti-war stance is one that aims for a lasting peace.