• TheAnonymouseJoker
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Wikipedia is not a reliable source of information for geopolitics that has the possibility to say anything against Anglo (or Anglo-Saxon) countries or their key vassal states like Israel or Japan (also Hongkong until 2019 CIA funded riots, and Ukraine from 2022-2024).

    My long term friend is a Palestinian, and Hamas being the only line of their defense is critical to their existence, until Palestine is liberated, rolled back to the UN partition guidelines, and Palestinians allowed to form a strong independent military that can thrash US-funded IDF terrorists.

    If you think Hamas is detached from Palestine, simply put, either you are idiot or dishonest towards the cause of liberation of Palestine. You are a victim of reactionary Western propaganda.

    • davelA
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Wikipedia is not a reliable source of information for geopolitics

      NATOPedia. I’m sure it’s just a coincidence that Katherine Maher used to be the CEO of Wikimedia and now works for the Atlantic Council.