“He could have done that, but it didn’t happen. Yes, the question probably wasn’t pressing at the time because there was no full-scale invasion.

“But our territories were occupied.”

of course, we all know what Trump did do: he tried to extort Zalenskyy for dirt on Hunter Biden by withholding relief funding that the US Congress had already authorized to send to Ukraine. He was even impeached over it.

  • @lntl
    link
    English
    11 year ago

    Depends on if the invaders plan to genocide the people or not. The threat of genocide should influence a leader to fight. The cost of genocide outweighs lives lost in conflict.

    • @Senokir
      link
      English
      -1
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      deleted by creator

      • @lntl
        link
        English
        01 year ago

        If the lives lost in genocide are more than those lost in a successful defense, yes. I don’t think I understand what you’re getting at.

        • @Senokir
          link
          English
          0
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          deleted by creator

          • @lntl
            link
            English
            -11 year ago

            It doesn’t imply that. Fight if you can successfully defend or there is genocide. Ukraine’s ability to successfully defend is dependent on foreigners and that’s a risky position to be in. That is, gambling the lives of your people on the goodwill of foreigners.

            • @Senokir
              link
              English
              0
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              deleted by creator

              • @lntl
                link
                English
                -11 year ago

                Your tone is too aggressive for me to engage with. Best wishes