“He could have done that, but it didn’t happen. Yes, the question probably wasn’t pressing at the time because there was no full-scale invasion.

“But our territories were occupied.”

of course, we all know what Trump did do: he tried to extort Zalenskyy for dirt on Hunter Biden by withholding relief funding that the US Congress had already authorized to send to Ukraine. He was even impeached over it.

  • @Senokir
    link
    English
    1
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    deleted by creator

    • @lntl
      link
      English
      111 months ago

      Depends on if the invaders plan to genocide the people or not. The threat of genocide should influence a leader to fight. The cost of genocide outweighs lives lost in conflict.

      • @Senokir
        link
        English
        -1
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        deleted by creator

        • @lntl
          link
          English
          011 months ago

          If the lives lost in genocide are more than those lost in a successful defense, yes. I don’t think I understand what you’re getting at.

          • @Senokir
            link
            English
            0
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            deleted by creator

            • @lntl
              link
              English
              -111 months ago

              It doesn’t imply that. Fight if you can successfully defend or there is genocide. Ukraine’s ability to successfully defend is dependent on foreigners and that’s a risky position to be in. That is, gambling the lives of your people on the goodwill of foreigners.

              • @Senokir
                link
                English
                0
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                deleted by creator

                • @lntl
                  link
                  English
                  -111 months ago

                  Your tone is too aggressive for me to engage with. Best wishes