Reading about FOSS philosophy, degoogling, becoming against corporations, and now a full-blown woke communist (like Linus Torvalds)

  • imAadeshOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    If workers run the government, then sure.

    • ConfusedLlama@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      That’s assuming that all workers have good intentions and consider the good of all humans before power.

      Well, surprise! Workers are humans. And we have seen many times what happens when uncontrolled power has been given to any human group or individual humans.

      There should be no power to the government. Only management positions. And those management positions need to be open to all people with abilities regarding those management positions.

      Of course this discussion in this form is an oversimplification (e.g. no mention of whether/how to run a police force, a judiciary, or a military), but the point is that not only a “government being run by workers” wouldn’t solve any problem, it would introduce even more, in my opinion. It’s just as bad as effectively letting the corporations or rich people run the government. Looks at the US

      • irmoz@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        There should be no power to the government. Only management positions. And those management positions need to be open to all people with abilities regarding those management positions.

        Yo. You just described a worker run government.

    • Uncle_Iroh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      In theory it’s great, but have you seen the complete fucking braindead idiots we share this world with?

      • imAadeshOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        In India we have a corporation named AMUL. It is collectively run by 3.6 Million farmers. It has wide variety of dairy products such as milk, yoghurt, ice cream, chocolates etc. If farmers can… Then what’s wrong in believing we can.

        Edit, its not 5000, it is 3.6 Million milk producers

        • ConfusedLlama@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          No problem with that! That’s actually a great thing, in my opinion. The problem, however would be a government run by any specific group of people with any specific properties other than their abilities. Because otherwise it would inevitably lead to dictatorship, as it has been tried many times throughout the history.

          In short:
          corporations run by workers -> Good!
          governments run specifically by workers/corporations/religious institutions/rich people/etc -> No, please no!

          Everyone should be able to participate in running and managing our society.

          • irmoz@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            “Worker” isn’t a specific group

            It’s everyone. We are all workers

            Workers controlling the state means absolute democracy for all.

            • ConfusedLlama@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Ok, fair enough. So, everyone should be allowed, regardless of their way of thinking, to participate in managing the society. Right?
              (right?)

              (Also, in general, regardless of who governs, the government still should not, under any circumstances, limit individual liberties and human rights, free access to information, etc, since these are very basic stuff and should not be overridden by any socio-economic system.)

      • Prunebutt@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You do realize that some of these idiots have way more power (money) than they should have any right to? Elon Musk, Bobby Kotick, …

        • Uncle_Iroh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Elon is just an ultra autist, I don’t think he’s stupid if you make him do some engineering stuff.

      • Haui@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        The problem is: intelligence doesn’t help either. Sure, it lets you grasp problems pretty fast, makes you a good learner but do you have any ideas how many psychopaths are actually gifted?

        As an autistic individual, I‘d say the autistic way would be pretty awesome as a government. You have to tell the truth and are not allowed to care how anyone receives it (what could go wrong, right?). I‘m obviously joking, mostly. I‘d explore it though.

        I think the current way is the worst (turning more populist every day) because the majority of people is rather unintelligent and does not have a logical concept on life (from an autistic standpoint).

        • rephlekt2718@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Say more about how the majority of people don’t have a logical concept of life from an autistic standpoint, I’m curious!

          • Haui@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            If you start reading about autistic people, you will most likely hear a couple things very often. It’s not a law as every autistic person is different but three common things I hear and read often are:

            • thruthful to a the point of rudeness
            • often use logic where most people would use gut feeling or intuition
            • have a particular knack for justice, often in a binary sense

            Obviously, there are a lot of other things that can identify or sum up autistic people but these fit the situation I‘m talking about. One more may be useful: we don’t suffer from the so called „framing effect“ where neurotypical people would make two different decisions on the same question according to the situation they’re in. Most autistic dont do this. We look at a problem without considering our current situation. Some say thats why we are less likely to become corrupt. We couldn’t care less if our friend really likes to work in our company. If someone else is better suited, he gets hired, for example.

            • pjhenry1216@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              This is a very poor understanding of autism. You’ve taken such a small sliver that this comparison is going to not only offend a lot of people but also confuse a lot of people. The given properties you’re invoking are such a small subset of autism and not even that widespread and hell, it ignores the core reasoning behind some. Brutal honesty is often tied with inability to be empathetic. You’re doing yourself a disservice using autism as your “model” here.

              • Haui@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                Thanks for your thoughts. I simply disagree. Being autistic means something else for every person who fits the description and for me it is this.

                Attacking my personal understanding and using the wording you do is overreaching and mean. Instead of telling me to not say something, you could ask what I meant or how I arrived to this conclusion. But you chose not to.

                If you are either a psychologist or an autistic person, you may speak about your own ideas. If not, I ask you to leave autistic people talking about the experience of being autistic be.

                • pjhenry1216@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  You literally just defeated your own argument. You just made the claim its your own personal definition and therefore would need to be described every single time you use it otherwise you would have a failure of communication.

                  Autism is different for everyone and that’s why it’s terrible to use it to describe the details of something.

                  And you aren’t describing your own experience. You are describing a government system. If you are admitting it’s extremely defined and only works in your head and not whoever you’re talking to, you will have a failure to communicate.

                  Edit: actually, that folks disagreed with you enough to comment is more a sign of that failure than any explanation I can provide. And you still provided it as a way to describe other autistics despite claiming otherwise.

                  • Haui@discuss.tchncs.de
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Thank you for using less violent speech this time. I still don’t understand why you feel like you need to correct my opinion here. Again, if you‘re on the spectrum or an expert, feel free to identify yourself. Otherwise I will stay by my opinion. Have a good one.