• kevincox
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 years ago

    But why? It seems weird to choose your tools based on the language they are implemented in. I love Rust (it is my goto language) but I choose my tools based on what they do, not how they were implemented.

    • nutomicOPMA
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      Tools written in Rust are generally both performant and correct (few runtime crashes or other programming bugs). There arent many other languages with this combination of advantages.

      • kevincox
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        That seems like a big leap. I have seen many performant and buggy Rust tools.

        But either way, if your goal is to find tools that are performant and correct why not call it fastreliableyour.life? Focus on the actual direct benefits rather than implying them and excluding other tools that may fit your needs.

        • nutomicOPMA
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          Of course you are free to create such a website.

    • blob42
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      I will add an other perspective that is rarely mentioned: because it pollutes less. The same way you would say why choose a car based on the fuel type it uses.

      See if you consider the amount of energy wasted running interpreted languages and other fancy bloated runtimes, and consider what should we do in an ideal world where hamans respect nature and do not make things for the sole purpose of profit, then choosing your tools based on the amount of energy they use to run doesn’t seem so far fetched anymore.