Nicholas Burns, the U.S. ambassador to China, said that Washington was not seeking confrontation with Beijing, but U.S. leadership in some areas needed to be recognized.
Sorry if I’m missing something here, but this seems clickbaity to me. From what I can glean from the short video clip he’s stating that the U.S. is a leader in “this region” which could mean a geographic region or a region of technology advacement. Inferring that his statement is “you must accept U.S. leadership” seems intentionally worded to spark outrage and garner clicks.
I think they try to downplay this by “clarifying” in the blurb below the video: “U.S. leadership in some areas needed to be recognized.”
Intel is a leader in some areas of processor technology. Intel can make that exact claim. By making that claim, Intel is not telling AMD “nakedly” that they “must accept Intel’s leadership.”
Sorry if I’m missing something here, but this seems clickbaity to me. From what I can glean from the short video clip he’s stating that the U.S. is a leader in “this region” which could mean a geographic region or a region of technology advacement. Inferring that his statement is “you must accept U.S. leadership” seems intentionally worded to spark outrage and garner clicks.
I think they try to downplay this by “clarifying” in the blurb below the video: “U.S. leadership in some areas needed to be recognized.”
Intel is a leader in some areas of processor technology. Intel can make that exact claim. By making that claim, Intel is not telling AMD “nakedly” that they “must accept Intel’s leadership.”