• Kajika
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Spending 3000$ to assemble a PC and installing TrueNas as is not new nor informative to me. I’m not a huge fan of rich people spending thousand of dollars building a power hog a call it a nice NAS.

    The post would be more interesting if, at least, it would show the assembling (not stolen photos) and the software settings. For a really interesting post I would like to see a before/after benchmark of performance and power consumption.

    I don’t think any server, especially self hosting should be CISC based like x86 architecture but RISC like arm or RiSC-V. The power usage is a order of magnitude less. Also really building yourself would probably cost hundreds and not thousands of dollars.

    • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      There’s a crap tonne of youtube videos showing people building them on the cheap and quite a few that use low-powered Celeron boards to keep power usage down.

      • Kajika
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Celeron is x86 and quiet bad at its job as far as I have always seen. Benchmark would be nice.

        • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It depends on your needs. If you need your NAS to also run your home server, you may need more (yet a N100, say, has h265 HW decoding) but for just running storage, a up to date Celeron will be more than adequate.