Wayland does not support screen savers: it does not have any provision that allows screen savers to even exist in any meaningful way. If you value screen savers, that’s kind of a problem.

Adding screen savers to Wayland is not simply a matter of “port the XScreenSaver daemon”, because under the Wayland model, screen blanking and locking should not be a third-party user-space app; much of the logic must be embedded into the display manager itself. This is a good thing! It is a better model than what we have under X11.

But that means that accomplishing that task means not just writing code, but engaging with whatever passes for a standards body or design committee in the Wayland world, and that is… how shall I put this… not something that I personally feel highly motivated to do.

  • spauldo
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Did he say that because the answer to IF it worked was no?

    • Pantherina@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      He was referring to proprietary BIOSes that work for sure but suck. Coreboot on the other hand also works but doesnt suck