SECRETARY BLINKEN: Well, good afternoon, everybody. Bonjour, tout le monde. Foreign Minister Joly, Mélanie, as always, I’m delighted to welcome you back to the State Department, to the United States, and it is a great pleasure to continue our ongoing collaboration on so many issues that join our countries together. As is fitting for such a close […]
And so we’ve significantly increased our production as well as making available to Europe liquefied natural gas. And we’re now the leading supplier of LNG to Europe to help compensate for any gas or oil that it’s losing as a result of Russia’s aggression against Ukraine.
I chose to write the topic because Blinken admits that US directly benefits from blowing up the pipeline creating a clear motive to do so. In fact, nobody has been able to come up with a credible motive for anybody but US to do this. Keep on coping with the fact that US fucked Europe over. These are the shared values you cherish so much on display there.
In short, you refuse to acknowledge the fact that Blinken plainly stated that US based LNG companies are the biggest benefactors of the pipelines being blown up.
I have not stated any rumors, speculations, or misinformation here. What I stated is that US is the only country with a clear motive and that Blinken confirmed this. Nobody has stated any coherent motives for other countries to destroy this infrastructure. You’re no different from a 9/11 conspiracy theorist.
That is not what Blinken said at all. You’re cherry picking pieces of his speech and then putting them together in creative and highly speculative ways. The US is temporarily supplying LNG to our allies so Europe doesn’t freeze come winter. And the portion where he talks about it being an opportunity never mentions LNG at all. Rather, it discusses getting off dependency on Russian fossil fuels. The conclusion you’ve produced is a Frankenstein’s monster of cherry picked quotes and bad faith interpretation.
You’re no different from a 9/11 conspiracy theorist.
You’re literally on here hawking conspiracy theories from a creative interpretation of a speech. Typical conspiracy theorist tactic: find a text and mangle it until it means what you want. So pot meet kettle.
That is not what Blinken said at all. You’re cherry picking pieces of his speech and then putting them together in creative and highly speculative ways.
I gave a literal quote from Blinken where he says that this is a huge opportunity for US based LNG suppliers. Nowhere did he say anything about it being temporary. That’s just you making things up.
You’re literally on here hawking conspiracy theories from a creative interpretation of a speech. Typical conspiracy theorist tactic: find a text and mangle it until it means what you want. So pot meet kettle.
I’m not hawking any conspiracy theories here. I’m simply pointing out that US has a clear motive while nobody else does.
Only a handful of countries have the means to do this, and claiming that it’s more likely that Russia blew up their own pipeline for no reason as opposed to US having done it with a clear reason is precisely the conspiracy theorist tactic one would use. The fact that anybody can even say that with a straight face is absolutely surreal.
US is a terrorist state with a long history of doing precisely these kinds of attacks. You live in a terrorist state buddy. Own it.
Once again, since your reading comprehension is evidently very poor, I’m saying that US is the one country with a clear motive, means, and history of doing such things. You absolutely can debate motives without absolute proof. That’s literally how every criminal investigation starts, by identifying a motive. You’re so bad at this. 😂
That’s literally what Blinken says in his speech:
deleted by creator
LMAO. Blinken states a fact that provides a huge motive for US to blow up the pipeline. Love how you’re still struggling to understand that. 😂
deleted by creator
I chose to write the topic because Blinken admits that US directly benefits from blowing up the pipeline creating a clear motive to do so. In fact, nobody has been able to come up with a credible motive for anybody but US to do this. Keep on coping with the fact that US fucked Europe over. These are the shared values you cherish so much on display there.
deleted by creator
In short, you refuse to acknowledge the fact that Blinken plainly stated that US based LNG companies are the biggest benefactors of the pipelines being blown up.
I have not stated any rumors, speculations, or misinformation here. What I stated is that US is the only country with a clear motive and that Blinken confirmed this. Nobody has stated any coherent motives for other countries to destroy this infrastructure. You’re no different from a 9/11 conspiracy theorist.
Keep coping.
That is not what Blinken said at all. You’re cherry picking pieces of his speech and then putting them together in creative and highly speculative ways. The US is temporarily supplying LNG to our allies so Europe doesn’t freeze come winter. And the portion where he talks about it being an opportunity never mentions LNG at all. Rather, it discusses getting off dependency on Russian fossil fuels. The conclusion you’ve produced is a Frankenstein’s monster of cherry picked quotes and bad faith interpretation.
You’re literally on here hawking conspiracy theories from a creative interpretation of a speech. Typical conspiracy theorist tactic: find a text and mangle it until it means what you want. So pot meet kettle.
I gave a literal quote from Blinken where he says that this is a huge opportunity for US based LNG suppliers. Nowhere did he say anything about it being temporary. That’s just you making things up.
I’m not hawking any conspiracy theories here. I’m simply pointing out that US has a clear motive while nobody else does.
Only a handful of countries have the means to do this, and claiming that it’s more likely that Russia blew up their own pipeline for no reason as opposed to US having done it with a clear reason is precisely the conspiracy theorist tactic one would use. The fact that anybody can even say that with a straight face is absolutely surreal.
US is a terrorist state with a long history of doing precisely these kinds of attacks. You live in a terrorist state buddy. Own it.
deleted by creator
Once again, since your reading comprehension is evidently very poor, I’m saying that US is the one country with a clear motive, means, and history of doing such things. You absolutely can debate motives without absolute proof. That’s literally how every criminal investigation starts, by identifying a motive. You’re so bad at this. 😂