Dear comrades, Let me introduce myself. Only quality jokes are allowed in the comments. Мир, труд, май, товарищи! Patreon: www.patreon.com/PeaceLaborMay
Dear comrades,
My apologies for clickbait. This is my attempt to introduce myself.
How about standing against British-American colonialism too, while you are at it. You know, tragedy of colonies that forgot their past under pressure, or are abandoning their present for sweet dream about other’s culture and foreign version of the preferred future. About general globalization tendencies.
Or complaining about excessive growth of Turkish influence now, they almost openly declare their aim to make second Osman empire.
It sounds fishy when someone is promoting bias only towards specific side in globalization game - game that started with cultural and economical influence of bigger neighbors - In this case, Russia, Osman, Persia and ended with countries that try to promote or enforce their culture, rights and wrongs to everyone on the globe that worth exerting influence on - which is British Empire in the past, and US in modern world.
As for citizens of Kazakhstan, regardless of citizen’s nationality, they all have their own culture and language that is and was fully represented in mandatory education and governmental affairs at the very least. Furthermore, their elites are playing strong nationalistic cards even when there is a risk of dividing their society to the point of riots and xenophobic tendencies getting out of hand. And current Russia is pretty much fine with this state of affairs.
Asking for more than that is asking for radicals from pro- and contra- Russian sides to appear and spoil the fun of peaceful life for the rest. Which already happened not so long ago in this particular country.
I wouldn’t worry about nonexistent ‘colonialism’ during the time when globalization takes over cultures and leaders try to get in power by fanning fires of nationalism.
As for my personal opinion, natural globalization is fine. If a part of foreign culture doesn’t fit locals, it will be rejected. If local culture cant keep up with times, it will be dissolved. If culture is strong, it would assimilate foreign influence and become richer.
Evil starts when some country tries to directly or indirectly dictate to someone else how they should live, what media content is cool and which opinion is bad. And “bad” country there currently is most definitely not the one that ‘created CA trauma’.
I don’t say that English is a superior language than other languages, let alone native languages of places that English speakers have colonized. Nobody else should make such implications either.
Kazakhstan is literally a Turkic nation, which has nothing to do with Turkey or the Ottoman empire, but rather it is literally themselves. Russian colonial propaganda in Central Asian countries often uses this ploy that you just used, that the Central Asians’ own culture is “foreign” and a threat.
Aside from the general whataboutism in your post, you also claimed that Russian colonization of Central Asia, which was violent and brutal, is “natural globalization”. Sorry, but there’s nothing natural about it. Even today if Kazakhstan were to try to get out from under Russia’s thumb, Russia would break them. So even now they live under threat.
You claim that Kazakhstan’s dysfunctional Soviet legacy is “fun and peaceful”. Sure… so wonderful.
How about standing against British-American colonialism too, while you are at it. You know, tragedy of colonies that forgot their past under pressure, or are abandoning their present for sweet dream about other’s culture and foreign version of the preferred future. About general globalization tendencies.
Or complaining about excessive growth of Turkish influence now, they almost openly declare their aim to make second Osman empire.
It sounds fishy when someone is promoting bias only towards specific side in globalization game - game that started with cultural and economical influence of bigger neighbors - In this case, Russia, Osman, Persia and ended with countries that try to promote or enforce their culture, rights and wrongs to everyone on the globe that worth exerting influence on - which is British Empire in the past, and US in modern world.
As for citizens of Kazakhstan, regardless of citizen’s nationality, they all have their own culture and language that is and was fully represented in mandatory education and governmental affairs at the very least. Furthermore, their elites are playing strong nationalistic cards even when there is a risk of dividing their society to the point of riots and xenophobic tendencies getting out of hand. And current Russia is pretty much fine with this state of affairs. Asking for more than that is asking for radicals from pro- and contra- Russian sides to appear and spoil the fun of peaceful life for the rest. Which already happened not so long ago in this particular country.
I wouldn’t worry about nonexistent ‘colonialism’ during the time when globalization takes over cultures and leaders try to get in power by fanning fires of nationalism.
As for my personal opinion, natural globalization is fine. If a part of foreign culture doesn’t fit locals, it will be rejected. If local culture cant keep up with times, it will be dissolved. If culture is strong, it would assimilate foreign influence and become richer. Evil starts when some country tries to directly or indirectly dictate to someone else how they should live, what media content is cool and which opinion is bad. And “bad” country there currently is most definitely not the one that ‘created CA trauma’.
I don’t say that English is a superior language than other languages, let alone native languages of places that English speakers have colonized. Nobody else should make such implications either.
Kazakhstan is literally a Turkic nation, which has nothing to do with Turkey or the Ottoman empire, but rather it is literally themselves. Russian colonial propaganda in Central Asian countries often uses this ploy that you just used, that the Central Asians’ own culture is “foreign” and a threat.
Aside from the general whataboutism in your post, you also claimed that Russian colonization of Central Asia, which was violent and brutal, is “natural globalization”. Sorry, but there’s nothing natural about it. Even today if Kazakhstan were to try to get out from under Russia’s thumb, Russia would break them. So even now they live under threat.
You claim that Kazakhstan’s dysfunctional Soviet legacy is “fun and peaceful”. Sure… so wonderful.