• Cyclohexane
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    152
    arrow-down
    44
    ·
    10 months ago

    Our track record dealing with covid shows us that our approach was largely unsuccessful. Masking must be enforced, not suggested. This is the only effective solution.

    • socsa
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      I tend to agree, but realistically who is going to enforce it? You’ve got to take into consideration the impact the constant stream of conflict has on low level employees who end up responsible for this enforcement. For those who want to protect themselves, N95 masks are highly effective when used properly.

      • Duamerthrax
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        10 months ago

        You also need to wear eye protection. Even just regular, prescription glasses showed a 30% reduction in infection rates. Masks don’t protect if other people wont also wear them.

      • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Right, it’s not going to be accepted by the public or broadly enforced by anyone. The only thing we can do is wear effective masks to protect ourselves. That’s basically been the reality of it the whole time.

      • Cyclohexane
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        10 months ago

        who is going to enforce it?

        In an ideal world, the community. In our current world, the government must require businesses to require customers to wear masks and social distance, and threaten them with suspending their business if they do not comply.

        the impact the constant stream of conflict has on low level employees who end up responsible for this enforcement

        It will not be constant. Places where this was enforced strictly did not have that trouble. It is the wishy-washy enforcement that empowered people to do this. It will be a short lived protest that dies out quickly, and the suffering will be far easier than that of covid deaths.

        For those who want to protect themselves, N95 masks are highly effective when used properly

        From my understanding, it is not enough. A person sharing a public space with you and not wearing a mask poses a threat, and this threat is massive if they are carrying the virus (even if non-symptomatic).

        People must not have the freedom to cause the death or others by spreading respiratory viruses due to childish irresponsibility because their favorite youtuber said so.

      • AnarchoYeasty@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        Make good paying security jobs whose sole purpose is covid enforcement (joking) (maybe) (people who refuse to mask make me angry as fuck. It’s such a low effort way to save lives)

    • DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      People were such dimwits about it though. Even if you had a security guard at the entrance to every shop challenging people to wear properly fitted n95s, I’m certain heaps of people would remove it after they walked past just on principle.

      • AntiOutsideAktion [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        59
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        The American culture is uniquely garbage because of the unique history of having a frontier for self serving pieces of shit to murder a patch of land empty for themselves and assert their right to tell everyone to fuck off. When the frontier was exhausted the homestead became the small business. When the small businesses were absorbed, “you can’t tell me what to do” became having a big truck and eating hamburgers with the motivation of spite.

        • CrapConnoisseur@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          We’re also uniquely garbage because our nation was founded by a bunch of religious zealots who pissed off everyone in Britain with their dickishness so much that they were told to fuck off and be assholes somewhere else.

          • Chipthemonk@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            13
            ·
            10 months ago

            You clearly haven’t read anything about the American revolution. Stop spewing your bullshit in an attempt to elevate your holy thank everyone mantra. Have you heard of taxation without representation? The stamp act? Freedom of expression?

            If you think the British had it right and the American colonies were in the wrong, you are clearly ignorant. The constitution of the US, once it was formed, reshaped the entire world in a more positive way.

            • spauldo
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              I don’t think (s)he was talking about the revolution so much as the founding of certain colonies. Massachusetts, for example.

                • spauldo
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  The pilgrims were Puritans. Not sure where you got the idea that they weren’t.

      • Cyclohexane
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yeah it was a shitshow, all because of how politicized it became. No one in 2018 would have thought that asking people to wear a face mask would become such an embarrassing ordeal.

        But trust me, it’s easy to catch a mask less person in a store. It shouldn’t take more than a couple incidents before they learn their lesson and make an example for others.

        • SocialMediaRefugee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          “Police are bad unless it is to arrest people over a mask”

          Thanks for coming over from reddit

          • Cyclohexane
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Police are bad because they don’t serve the interests of the community

              • Cyclohexane
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                Curbing the spread of a lethal viral infection is in the interest of the community

                  • Cyclohexane
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    Why do you think that curbing the spread of a lethal viral infection is against the interest of the community?

                    Face masks are not a religious headdress. They have been used for a very long time by doctors, nurses, lab workers, etc. to protect themselves from other infections and micro objects. It is surprising that this has to be explained. Where did you get the idea that all these nurses and lab workers (including atheist ones) are wearing a religious headdress?

    • bumblebeehellbringer [fae/faer, they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      We also need lockdowns where people are supported in staying home long enough to eliminate the virus, regular and updated testing, updated vaccines, free high quality accessible healthcare, and changes to make workplaces safe - like letting people work from home; changing in-person work to be socially distanced, and unlimited paid time off so people can get medical care when they need it.

      • redtea@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        The number of big babies who huffed and puffed at being asked to not stand on other people’s feet. Unreal. As if keeping 6ft distance from complete strangers in the supermarket is a major request. Like, why do you need my body heat we don’t even know each other.

    • interdimensionalmeme
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      20
      ·
      10 months ago

      You people need to be stopped, you are insane autoritarians. The crisis is over, we are but fin to wear mask forever. You had your time in the lime light, now it’s back to normal. Continue to abuse this position and you will not get the population to mobilise again to alleviate the situation.

      • smooth_jazz_warlady@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        10 months ago

        Once again we see the abled throwing tantrums over the idea of having to suffer a mild discomfort so as to protect the lives of the disabled, especially the immunocompromised.

        I have an aunt whose immune system has to be medicated into nonexistence at all times so it doesn’t wreck her body, and she is still fucked up from covid, months after “getting over” it and with multiple vaccine shots beforehand. How many people have you killed or left permanently ill, and never realised, in your selfish ignorance?

        If there were any divine justice in this world, idiots like you would be smote with horrible autoimmune diseases or total organ failure, forced to go on anti-rejection drugs for the rest of your lives, and live with the same fear you force on others, the fear that any “harmless” disease could be the death of you.

      • ButtBidet [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        Protecting other people from death and disability is authoritarian.

        we are but fin to wear mask forever

        Guy there are better vaccines and anti-virals out there. Literally NO ONE is asking you to “mask forever”.

    • Cam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      34
      ·
      10 months ago

      Masking must be enforced

      How authoritative. Personal responsibility is the answer. Not forcing others to your level. If your threat level is that high, ok that is your choice. However everyones threat level to this thing should take into account that not everyone in your community will be on the same page as you.

      Unless you want another trucker convoy emerging, I suggest not forcing any mandates. Enforce any mandate on yourself, but only yourself.

      • Cyclohexane
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        10 months ago

        No one must have the freedom to cause the death of other people by spreading lethal respiratory viruses, only because they failed to comply with every one of the million warnings about covid-19 and masks. Just because your favorite youtuber told you masks are bad does not give you the right to murder people. This behavior must be stopped at all costs, and I do not care what you think of it.

        • interdimensionalmeme
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          10 months ago

          You are an absolute virus factory, you should never be allowed outside again. You stay home forever, we’ll bring your food don’t worry. We can’t take the chance of your germs getting out again.

          • Cyclohexane
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            Hehe fun story. Anyways where’s the argument? A

        • Cam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          10 months ago

          By going outside and interacting in the world will always have the risk of danger, injury, illness and death. The modern world is the most safest envoriment that have ever existed.

          If restrictions do return, it will only cause more division and more protests. The trucker convoy that started in Canada was a response to the government overreach in Canada and across the west since politicians and the media were treating the population at large like children.

          We are adults (And I assume you are also an adult), and therefore we can make our own decisions. You can wear a mask. Your kids if you got any can wear a mask. You can refuse to spend time with others who do not wear masks, you can refuse to work at a job that makes masking optional, you can refuse to shop at places that refuse to enforce a mask policy.

          This behavior must be stopped at all costs, and I do not care what you think of it.

          Alright, but many people do not care what you think and will disregard your strict stance on the matter. Not because they are “murderers” which is quite a claim to make, but because everyone has their own threat level. My advice is, include the fact many other people do not care about your threat model and not force your threat model onto every one else. The world does not revolve around anybody.

      • redtea@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        Personal responsibility is the answer if the question is, ‘Would you like to contribute to millions of unnecessary deaths and further countless suffering?’ It clearly doesn’t work as a public health strategy.

          • CurrentBias@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Covid spreads pre-symptomatically and asymptomatically, and spreading it does harm people, so good luck with that logic

        • Cam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          There is no need for a public health strategy. This idea that we all must bubble wrap the world is insane. Germs and viruses will always exist. Do what is best for you stop getting mad at others who have different threat models than you.

          I wish everyone used Linux, but I know that will never happen. I use Linux and will help anyone that wants to use linux and thats were it ends. I move on and am happy being a Linux user. I do not expect the government to force the population to use Linux to make a more digitial secure and private society, that will be insane and will piss off most of the population. Mandates are no different.

          • redtea@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            If we took this approach to those other germs and viruses that you mention, quality of life and life expectancy would plummet as fast as infant mortality shot up. There’s nothing special about Covid in that regard except that it needs more respect than many other issues.

            Edit: I edited my comment because I was a bit rude. I apologise for that.

            • Cam@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              The world will always have a hint of danger, and germs and viruses are included in this mix. Life expectancy did not increase due to public compliants to health measures, it increased due to things like soap, showering/bathing every day or two instead of every few months and the standard for hygeine in factories like meat plants. And medicine has come a long way to cure old nasty diseases.

              Edit: I edited my comment because I was a bit rude. I apologise for that.

              Don’t know what you said but I do appreciate the apology.

              • redtea@lemmygrad.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                I know what you’re saying. But basic hygeine, etc, work against some illnesses while other health scares require different strategies (as well as good hygeine). I think we may be talking at cross purposes, working with very different models of the world and of what’s possible.

                • Cam@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  If COVID was as bad as it was advertised. We would of seen the results in the world, and therefore people would voluntarily take the appropate percautions. No need for state intervention. If the pandemic was bad and the state did nothing about it, except maybe advise some caution which is how Japan mostly handled the pandemic, people will do what is nesissary.

                  Why does politics have to get involved? Because the government got so involved in the pandemic, that why it became politicial. Sometimes ignoring a problem like a virus you cannot really control is the best course of action and it will take care of itself in a grassroots sort of a way.

                  • CurrentBias@kbin.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    10 months ago

                    One of the smartest ways to win in the game Plague Inc is to make your virus have mild acute symptoms that are easy to dismiss or confuse as other things, and then really fucked up chronic symptoms later on. Symptom severity is not the same as underlying disease severity. The immune system doesn’t always enter the panic mode entailed by a fever, in some cases because the virus has outsmarted it. HIV is a virus that starts as a cold, and then does all its damage silently. Judging a virus by its acute symptoms is one way to fuck around and find out

        • Chipthemonk@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          I didn’t realize there were so many tankies on Lemmy. Go live in your dystopian land. I’ll enjoy my personal liberties and high standards of life. Thanks!

        • SocialMediaRefugee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          and you should feel lucky that the west is so backwards, violent and bloodthirsty

          You really need to travel outside of your bubble sometime

        • Chipthemonk@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          What you are linking was penned by Karla Soares-Weiser. That’s one fucking person against all the folk that actually wrote the article. Karla is just covering her ass because all the people like you are mad that the biggest and most respected journal came out saying that they don’t think masks make a different.

          Also, take your hyperbole shit and stick it up your ass.

          • Aaliyah1@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Except what she point out, as multiple people have, is that all the rct’s that that study look at are really only studying adherence to mask mandates, not mask themselves. They combined studies where people wore masks infrequently with ones where mask mandates were more complied with. Not to mention it ignores all mechanistic evidence, all of which points to masks working

            It’s literally just the conservative thing that has been done throughout the whole pandemic, where they refuse to wear masks, and then when Covid continues to spread exponentially, they throw their arms up and go “look, masks don’t work!” I’d say it’s the lack of compliance that’s the issue

            • Chipthemonk@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              Your argument is tired and juvenile. It’s the classic “if only we masked up harder!”

              Look at places like Japan. COVID spread there like wildfire. I guess they didn’t mask hard enough? Haha. No. Masks didn’t make a fucking difference in the most compliant place in the world.

              Also, it’s not conservative versus liberal. Somehow masks got tied up in political theater, and now people like you use the mask to express your political affiliation. You love the mask because it expresses left wing to you, and you think that right wing is evil, so you become obsessed with masks. Maybe if we all recognized that one or the other side is not evil, and has no intrinsic connection to masks, we’d be better off.

              • Aaliyah1@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                Okay glad to see you’ve stopped trying to defend the Cochrane stuff.

                Also what the fuck are you talking about? Japan was widely touted as a Covid success story. Including by conservatives who liked the fact that they never imposed a mask mandate.

                • Chipthemonk@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 months ago

                  I am not stopping a defense of the Cochrane review. It’s the best current study we have and it announces that it’s not clear if masks work. If we don’t know if they work, why should governments keep mandating them? They shouldn’t. Full stop.

                  Regarding Japan, here’s an article by the NYT: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/01/24/opinion/japan-covid.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare they talk about Japan’s success. Notice how masks do not feature heavily in the article.

                  Here’s another one that places your claim in doubt: https://www.cfr.org/in-brief/japan-covid-19-pandemic-response-restrictions-two-years

                  Finally, the total number of deaths in Japan and the US differ widely in large part because the two populations are, broadly, very different. COVID disproportionately effects overweight people. Ask anyone that worked in the hospitals during peak waves. The simple fact is that fat people don’t do well with Covid. Now ask yourself, is there an equal number of overweight people (%) in Japan to the US? No. People in Japan are far less overweight than people in the US. It’s no wonder, therefore, that the US fared worse because it’s population is move overweight.

                  • Aaliyah1@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    I am extremely confused as to what you intended to prove with those two links. Masks were not mentioned by either, the second link barely discussed Covid and seemed to focus on foreign relations, and both agreed Japan’s response was a success, which contradicts your implication that it somehow wasn’t. And the first guy says he was supportive of the government’s guidelines, which included masks. So unless there’s something else against masks that he said, I’m gonna extrapolate that he is not anti-mask.

                    Ok, I’m gonna just skip over the whole blaming overweight people part and ask you - do you believe overweight people are more likely to spread Covid? Because we’re discussing spread, do masks work to combat spread. Japan had lower deaths but they also had lower cases. Was it also due to overweight people that Covid cases, not deaths, were higher in the usa. And maybe a lower case load has something to do with the lower deaths in Japan, more than overweight people. Japan’s mask usage was always extremely high, even without a mandate, and remains so.

                    And if you want to continue the Cochrane stuff-it’s not a study. It’s a meta analysis of a bunch of studies, all of which were pretty well-known prior to the Cochrane study, and the problems with them were already recognized by those studies’ authors. So the Cochrane study just lumps a bunch of poor quality studies into one poor quality meta analysis that even the Cochrane study authors write is inconclusive and probably would not have made the splash it has if it was not done by a bunch of brownstone institute anti-maskers who decided to go on a press tour saying their study said something that it didn’t.

                    Not to mention we have mechanical filtration studies proving the physics of mask wearing, so unless there’s something mystical about Covid, these studies still apply.

        • Chipthemonk@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          10 months ago

          Look at the date you dumb fuck. Then recognize that the Cochrane review is highly respected when it comes to public health science.

          You people are ridiculous.

          • lukini@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            10 months ago

            You ever gonna respond to people telling you your posts are a misrepresentation or are you just gonna call people dumb fucks? Kinda hard to trust someone posting like this.

            • Chipthemonk@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              I’ll happily respond to someone that refutes the Cochrane review in a logical and substantive way.

          • HackyHorse3000@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            I know you’re being combative so it’s unlikely, but did you actually read both sources? One is a review of around 70 studies, before and during the pandemic, sonme unpublished. The other is a review of 5000 articles which found statistically significant results…

            • Chipthemonk@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              The responded article says this:

              A total of 6 studies were included, involving 4 countries, after a total of 5,178 eligible articles were searched in databases and references.

              They literally typed some shit into the journal search database that had that many articles. They didn’t study all of those articles. Their study is founded exclusively from 6 studies. The Cochrane review’s approach is far more comprehensive and goes into considerably more depth in many more studies.

              So, maybe you didn’t read the articles? Or maybe you don’t understand population level, public health study methods.

              • HackyHorse3000@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                Fair point, I did misread that. But it seems you’re acting in bad faith with just one source again. Any search amongst published articles provide evidence for the efficacy and cost effectiveness of masks as a adjunct preventative measure. It seems rather like cherry picking to trust the one place that goes against the grain, no?