i need some help buying a monochrome laser printer with scanning that supports linux, plug and play is a nice thing to have.

🖨️ my available brands are : Epson, cannon and brother

❌ no need for WiFi, fax ,ect

  • thejevans
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    1 year ago

    The cheapest brother laser printer is the one to get.

    • Nioxic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is what i did.

      9 years ago. Still runs like new. Great little thing!

      Its 100% wireless though. But connects to my router and then everything on the LAN can print

      • Random Dent
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Mine isn’t wireless, but yeah I got it probably 10 years ago too - still runs like new, never broken down, actually works better in Linux than it does in Windows, and I think it’s only on it’s 2nd-3rd toner cartridge ever.

      • dartanjinn@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        At all three tiers (low, mid, and high end), out of those three available brands, you always want brother.

      • nbailey@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Might be worth it if you want network printing. Usb only is fine, but it’s worth paying a little extra to get Ethernet if that’s what you want. Mdns/avahi/bonjour make things easy for sure. Wifi printers always suck, I’d avoid that. I’ve had nothing but good results with my brother b&w on wired Ethernet.

      • thejevans
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’re getting slightly slower print speed. 27ppm vs 32 or 36 for the HL-2300D.

      • 20gramsWrench@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        honestly, laser is laser, higher prices are usually stuffs like, integrated scan or bigger paper capacity, mostly added features rather than print quality.

        For the plug and play, you probably are still going to have to pick a driver during installation, most of the time, drivers for older model the same class of printer will work

        fake ex: PAPERLOVE CFG-3420D will work fif you have a PAPERLOVE CFG-3520D

        • mr_right@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          the reason i don’t want to install drivers is the automatic forced updates, you know the kind that HP does to break their printer, i have got into linux to get away from that shit not to go back to it

          • 20gramsWrench@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I think hp and windows rotted the way you view drivers, what I call drivers are just what your computer use to communicate with devices, they aren’t software suite that updates and ask for your account, drivers are like 2kb text files with a index of available function and what signal to sent to the printer for it to print, what you see as drivers is the heavy and predatory spyware they ship with printer to steal your data and make you spend more miney, when you install a printer on linux (especially brother) you are just getting the little file with the printer’s language, depending on your distro, it will give you a big ass list of available drivers to use with the printer you just connected, it won’t ever ask you to update or even try to communicate with the internet, since it’s a passive file that your computer use and not a program that is launched, those files are available on windows btw, the manufacturers just make them very hard to get for obvious reasons, and windows itself will install the spyware as if it’s a driver through windows update, one of the many reason I fucked off of it

            • Reihar@beehaw.orgB
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Also, to be fair, HP has download link to windows drivers only but they heavily push the windows crapware suite download links on their site.

              • 20gramsWrench@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                They probably do but I have a vague work memory of a model of personal printer that forced me to go look through the driverstore folder of another computer with the spyware installed because they didn’t offer anything else but their program which couldn’t be launched in the env I had to do it in

          • nottheengineer@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            You always need a driver. What you don’t want is a driver that’s malware. Brother is the best brand in that regard, but unfortunately becoming worse too.

            • 20gramsWrench@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Printing itself is doomed to enshitification since any non-shit new project about it is met with the usual “why bother, we as a world need to stop printing anyway”