Mine is the grammar nazi/the person who treats (what are imo) casual online discussions like dissertations.
I know how to write and make convincing points but I’m not gonna sweat that the point I made was a bit broad or that I didn’t capitalize the right thing.
Generally speaking, if you could tell what I meant and still correct or dispute my point with me, that’s my online etiquette pet peeve.
People not interest in actually talking and being incapable of changing their minds even when they are proved wrong, they still continue defending an pointless point of view, refusing to acknowledge the new information, its so infuriating.
Absolutely! I literally joined this site because I wanted to learn more and have nuanced opinions about current and past events in an accurate way. I don’t wanna hear someone say that Stalin was perfect. We’re all comrades here, we can be honest and say he was based af and did way waay more good things for the USSR than mistakes, but ignoring the recriminalization of Homosexuality that was decriminalized only years before, is not a good model to follow. I’ve seen people say, not here but ofc on Reddit, that Stalin was perfect, followed by a sea of comments talking shit about Stalin. I wanna see nuance, I’d like to see Black and White and shades between, don’t say that anyone was perfect, otherwise they would have been leading a paradise. Stalin is just an example but yea basically I dislike super simple takes from people that don’t change their minds