• glimse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      14 hours ago

      That’s called an anecdote and I’ve got one, too: I stopped eating red meat and now I don’t find beef or lamb appetizing at all.

      Seems like it doesn’t happen to everyone and the article agrees with that

      Of the 40 participants, 28 reported an increase in meat disgust.

      • ThirdConsul
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Of the 40 participants, 28 reported an increase in meat disgust.

        A study on a group of 40 is an anecdote at best, a waste of resources at worst.

        Reporting on it in on a big news website should be a crime, as it’s just a clickbait.

        • usernamesAreTrickyOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          13 hours ago

          The article also site other studies too. (It calls the N=40 preliminary early research)

          • ThirdConsul
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            13 hours ago

            From another study with N=700:

            We measured self-reported meat consumption, meat disgust (by self-report and Implicit Association Test),

            IAT is phrenology of social studies. You can discard it as garbage. If a study is using IAT as methodology, it’s garbage done to gain some publication points.

            You can read more about IAT: https://econtent.hogrefe.com/doi/10.1027/1015-5759/a000778