• ThirdConsul
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Of the 40 participants, 28 reported an increase in meat disgust.

    A study on a group of 40 is an anecdote at best, a waste of resources at worst.

    Reporting on it in on a big news website should be a crime, as it’s just a clickbait.

    • usernamesAreTrickyOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      13 hours ago

      The article also site other studies too. (It calls the N=40 preliminary early research)

      • ThirdConsul
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        13 hours ago

        From another study with N=700:

        We measured self-reported meat consumption, meat disgust (by self-report and Implicit Association Test),

        IAT is phrenology of social studies. You can discard it as garbage. If a study is using IAT as methodology, it’s garbage done to gain some publication points.

        You can read more about IAT: https://econtent.hogrefe.com/doi/10.1027/1015-5759/a000778