Hi everyone! I want to be able to access a folder inside the guest that corresponds to a cloud drive that is mounted inside the guest for security purposes. I have tried setting up a shared filesystem inside Virt-Manager (KVM) with virtiofs (following this tutorial: https://absprog.com/post/qemu-kvm-shared-folder) but as soon as I mount the folder in order for it to be accessible on the guest host the cloud drive gets unmounted. I guess a folder cannot have two mounts at the same time. Aliasing the folder using bind and then sharing the aliased folder with the host doesn’t work either. The aliased folder is simply empty on the host.

Does anyone have an idea regarding how I might accomplish this? Is KVM the right choice or would something like docker or podman better suited for this job? Thank you.

Edit: To clarify: The cloud drive is mounted inside a virtual machine for security purposes as the binary is proprietary and I do not want to mount it on the host (bwrap and the like introduce a whole lot of problems, the drive doesn’t sync anymore and I have to relogin each time). I do not use the virtual machine per se, I just start it and leave it be.

  • eldavi
    1·
    19 days ago

    sshfs might work if your fuse drive is mounted with options that will let it be shared and you have sudo access to enable sshfs. also ssh access is a requirement.

    how is it mounted now? it should also be in that same mount printout and usually at the end of the line inside parenthesis.

      • eldavi
        1·
        18 days ago

        user_id=0,group_id=0

        do you have sudo access and are there any rules in /etc/sudo* that match your username or any of your groups? which distribution?

        • GathererStuffOPEnglish
          1·
          18 days ago

          Since originally writing the post I have switched to a rootless podman container. Running it how I did before (inside a VM) would simply yield user_id=1000,group_id=1000 I think.

          • eldavi
            1·
            18 days ago

            that implies that you’re not using the binary anymore since you’re in a container; is it using an overlay fs?

            • GathererStuffOPEnglish
              1·
              18 days ago

              I am using the binary. Just running it inside a container instead of a VM.

              overlay fs?

              Yes.

              • eldavi
                1·
                18 days ago

                so the drive isn’t mounted when the container starts; but you execute it after it started and then the drive is mounted?

                  • eldavi
                    1·
                    18 days ago

                    i’ve never seen a workflow like that so i don’t think i can help you with the container.

                    if getting it from the host os an option, then it makes sense to see if it’s possible and something like a sudoer rule or selinux could prevent that; my last question was my attempt to ascertain this.