She addresses only one thing: was life better pre 1950 viz a viz today for Tibetans. Of course, it’s better today but that in no justifies what China did.
Going by her logic, life under many dictators in the 20th century improved by leaps and bounds in many countries; does that justify their rule.
By directly attacking the person above, you are indulging in Ad hominem.
meanwhile in the real world, nice of you to out yourself as a supporter of slavery so we can know that it’s safe to ignore your bleatings
https://www.historicly.net/p/tibet-china-and-the-violent-reaction
She addresses only one thing: was life better pre 1950 viz a viz today for Tibetans. Of course, it’s better today but that in no justifies what China did.
Going by her logic, life under many dictators in the 20th century improved by leaps and bounds in many countries; does that justify their rule.
By directly attacking the person above, you are indulging in Ad hominem.