I see that it can be slower because of having all the dependencies included with the flatpak itself instead of relying solely on whats installed on the system. I read that this means it isolates or sandboxes itself from the rest of the system.

Does this not mean that it can’t infect the rest of the system even if it had malware?

I have seen people say that it isnt good for security because sometimes they force you to use a specific version of certain dependencies that often times are outdated but I’m wondering why that would matter if it was truly sandboxed and isolated.

Do they mean that installing flatpak itself is a security risk or that also specific flatpaks can be security risks themselves?

  • GolfNovemberUniform
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Well the sandboxing does help with trustworthy browsers so the websites can’t have excessive permissions. But relying on such a broken system isn’t a very good idea imo.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Sandboxing in the browser is different than the sandboxing done by flatpak.

      You really want your browser sandbox to be rock solid as any weakness allows for drive by attacks by websites.

      Flatpak uses bubblewrap under the hood so it is just as secure. Flatpak also has a security tracker and when security issues are found they are taken very seriously.