On Debian-based distros, when an app is available as a DEB or an AppImage (that doesn’t self-update), but no APT repository, PPA or Flatpak, the only option is to manually download each update, and usually manually check even whether there are updates.

But, what if those would be upgraded at the same time as everything else using the tools you’re familiar with ?

dynapt is a local web server that fetches those DEBs (and AppImages to be wrapped into DEBs) wherever those are, then serves these to APT like any package repository does.

I started building it a few months ago, and after using it to upgrade apps on my computers and servers for some time, I pre-released it for the first time last week.

The stable version will come with a CLI wizard to avoid this manual configuration.

Feedback is welcome :)

  • bizdelnick
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 months ago

    It is documented in libapt-pkg-doc (/usr/share/doc/libapt-pkg-doc/method.html/index.html).

    • KaKi87@jlai.luOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      In an APT package OMG 😂

      I found an online version though, which I would never have found through my search engine (and on a site that doesn’t even support HTTPS) 😅

      Looks like difficult reading too 😭

      Thanks anyway.

    • KaKi87@jlai.luOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yeah, I don’t have the skill for this. I’d be very happy if someone else would make this, but if not then I’m sticking to HTTP.

      • keturn@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        I went way down the rabbit hole on this one and ended up with a proof of concept that’s probably close enough to be able to wire it up: https://gitlab.com/-/snippets/3745244

        I guess it didn’t end up too much code, but I’m not entirely sure it’s worth it.

        (it’s after 3 AM? oh no what have I done)

        • KaKi87@jlai.luOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Why the OOP structure and syntax ? Sorry but it makes it difficult to read for me even in my own language 😅

          • keturn@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            uh, because TypeScript is an object-oriented language, as are the Deno APIs? I’m not sure I understand the question.

            • KaKi87@jlai.luOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              It’s more functional than object-oriented and I read the former better than the latter. 😅