• GolfNovemberUniform
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Still a shame it isn’t based on the best distro in the world as it was initially planned.

    EDIT: this was misinformation. Idk if I was hallucinating again or I confused it with another distro (e. g. BlendOS) but VanillaOS was never meant to be based on Arch.

        • bsergay@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          Very curious. I didn’t know this. I tried verifying this, but didn’t manage to do so.

          So, I got to ask; Was this just a joke? Or is there (some) truth to this claim?

          • GolfNovemberUniform
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            I would take a lot of time to find. Search in old TLE videos I guess. If he made news about it, there should be links to the sources too.

    • LeFantome@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      Thanks for the EDIT because I thought I had really missed something.

      I am addicted to Arch and the AUR but it is precisely that it is NOT Arch that makes Vanilla look attractive. Do I REALLY need multiple new kernels per month like Arch gives me?

      Having a more stable base sounds like a great idea. Using containers to get access to the Arch repositories and the AUR on top of Debian sounds even better. Vanilla bakes support for that scenario right in.