☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ to World NewsEnglish · 1 month agoChina's representative points out at the ICJ that armed resistance against occupation is enshrined in international law and is not terrorism.media.mas.tovideomessage-square19fedilinkarrow-up1104arrow-down110file-textcross-posted to: news@hexbear.networldnews@lemmygrad.ml
arrow-up194arrow-down1videoChina's representative points out at the ICJ that armed resistance against occupation is enshrined in international law and is not terrorism.media.mas.to☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ to World NewsEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square19fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: news@hexbear.networldnews@lemmygrad.ml
Your browser does not support playing HTML5 video. You can download a copy of the video file instead.
minus-square☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OPlinkfedilinkarrow-up24arrow-down6·1 month agoyou mean this Tibet? https://www.historicly.net/p/tibet-china-and-the-violent-reaction
minus-squareacargitz@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down13·1 month agoIf being reactionary meant relinquishing the right to national self determination, the Israelis would be justified in opposing a free Palestine on the basis of Hamas being salafist shits. But they are not because it does not.
minus-square小莱卡@lemmygrad.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up8·1 month agoSurely upholding the slaver tibetan aristocratic class was the tibetan people wishes 😂
minus-square☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OPlinkfedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down2·1 month agoIf you can’t understand the sheer absurdity of your comment, there’s really no helping you.
you mean this Tibet? https://www.historicly.net/p/tibet-china-and-the-violent-reaction
If being reactionary meant relinquishing the right to national self determination, the Israelis would be justified in opposing a free Palestine on the basis of Hamas being salafist shits. But they are not because it does not.
Surely upholding the slaver tibetan aristocratic class was the tibetan people wishes 😂
If you can’t understand the sheer absurdity of your comment, there’s really no helping you.