• luckystarr
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Because duplicate. That’s how I see it. Didn’t even want to dupe the post, let’s see if this one dupes as well. If yes, then I might post only take comments for… a few minutes.

        Posted with wefwef 0.8.2

        • interdimensionalmeme
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Then the deletion should have mention “duplicate of xxx” but also, this one has 700 upvotes, was the other one even more popular ?

          Also also, if it’s a duplicate then the proper action should have been merge not delete

          • luckystarr
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I don’t see so many upvotes. I only see 2. The software is still rough around the edges. Don’t worry about it.

            • interdimensionalmeme
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Ah that might be it. I thought it would be really egregious if an highly upvoted post is deleted. On the other hand, an inoffensive without votes, or many downvotes, won’t get seen either way, so I’m not sure moderation intervention was really needed either way