• luckystarr
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Because duplicate. That’s how I see it. Didn’t even want to dupe the post, let’s see if this one dupes as well. If yes, then I might post only take comments for… a few minutes.

    Posted with wefwef 0.8.2

    • interdimensionalmeme
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Then the deletion should have mention “duplicate of xxx” but also, this one has 700 upvotes, was the other one even more popular ?

      Also also, if it’s a duplicate then the proper action should have been merge not delete

      • luckystarr
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t see so many upvotes. I only see 2. The software is still rough around the edges. Don’t worry about it.

        • interdimensionalmeme
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ah that might be it. I thought it would be really egregious if an highly upvoted post is deleted. On the other hand, an inoffensive without votes, or many downvotes, won’t get seen either way, so I’m not sure moderation intervention was really needed either way