rando895 [she/her]

  • 2 Posts
  • 493 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: January 26th, 2024

help-circle






  • Its one of those things that can’t necessarily have words put to it. Think of it like this:

    The people we are, and become, is hugely influenced by those we surround ourselves with. Our relationships with each other are dialectical. I, as a trans woman, have found it enormously affirming/helpful/wonderful/etc. to have cis women as friends. Because its not “just” about things like clothes and makeup, in fact I am basically the most femme of my female friends so those things sort of fall on me funnily enough. There are sooo many other aspects to it. From emotional support, to finding out how similar many of your experiences are, and bonding. The number of times I have been told and experienced “we girls look out for eachother” makes me emotional just thinking about it.

    What can a cis woman help you learn? Idk. Depends on who she is. But I would highly recommend befriending a cis woman. Because you like spending time with her (just like everyone else you befriend) and both of you will become better versions of yourself, and in the case of being a trans woman, you’ll learn how to be a woman through basically osmosis.

    I know its easier said than done. But finding female friends through people you already know is key. And it is scary. But everyone on this sub belongs to a group of some of the most courageous people I know. So you can do it. You will have to be uncomfortable. But take time to be gentle with yourself, and things will get better.

    <3


  • One of two things imo, (1) either purely ideological, or (2) intentionally putting up a new fence to restrict access to a commodity for greater profits.

    (1) The government enacting these regulations stifles innovation, making it impossible to find better solutions for healthier teeth, and preventing communities (individuals really) from making their own decisions about their body.

    (2) The most efficient way to do things (fluoride for teeth) is collectively through municipal water sources. This is bad for profits/gdp. By not providing it (and potentially destroying old infrastructure) new markets are opened or expanded for fluoride, and a new “need” for new infrastructure is created, resulting in new profits/increased gdp.

    Bonus background reason: The more you can convince the citizens of your country of, the easier it is to control them

    Bonus Bonus reason: It gives “opposing” factions something to fight about that isn’t the class war, effectively distracting people from the on-going -gestures wildly at everything the west does-

    Basically using these 4 things as a starting point for all “why are government doing” questions in the west can help us understand it, and not fall down the thought terminating (cough liberal cough) rabbit hole of “gawd they are so stupid/evil! I can’t wait until the wet cheeto isn’t in power anymore! #love”



  • Tin soldiers and Donnie coming. We’re finally on our own. This summer I hear the drumming. Four dead in Mich-i-gan.

    I think it will take a fairly big reaction from the military to erode trust enough that it starts to crumble. And while the context is a little different now, I suspect the military will need to respond more violently than they did at Kent state.

    But the wonderful thing is restoring trust is very difficult (the empire has managed to restore it before, mind you), and maybe impossible given the current material conditions.






  • Also “living in traditional ways” is at best misleading. There is already more than enough to go around when we consider actual physical resources. Using market mechanisms to determine how things are distributed works very poorly in terms of meeting everyones needs, and blinds us to actual solutions.

    The idea of overshooting earths capacity is firmly rooted in extractive ideology (which is a cornerstone of capitalist economies) and doesn’t even begin to consider how an adjustment in economic output to meet real demand and not whatever is the most profitable, would result in massive changes in the way we do things.

    Food production could become more regenerative because we need to feed people not make money.

    Clothing industries would cut gigantic amounts of waste simply by ceasing the destruction of clothing to maintain high prices.

    And these 2 ideas alone could revolutionize nearly every aspect of our existence.

    Indigenous ways of doing is not extractive. It is better described as a collaboration with nature. Managing natural resources to meet our needs, and the needs of (often specifically) the next 7 generations. It means managing forests to make more forests, with all the flora and fauna that entails. Among other things

    The fascist part is:

    Ohh humans are the problem Okay, which humans? Who decides who gets what? Who lives and who dies? Is there any consideration for the power dynamics in our society (spoiler, no there is not)

    In short the quote who ever said it:

    Environmentalism without class struggle is just gardening.






  • Its understandable you would think this. Bill Gates spent butt loads of money to scrub his image clean, buying up media companies to make it more effective, and using charities to hide behind to appear philanthropic. All the while being a typical oligarch, and using the free money given to charity to get more tax breaks and increase his wealth and power.

    Its been very effective