• 0 Posts
  • 104 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 7th, 2023

help-circle

  • mlfhtoLinuxWhere Do You Guys Throw Your Local Git Repos?
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I actually have my whole home directory like that for that reason haha

    bin - executables
    dev - development, git projects
    doc - documents
    etc - symlinks to all the local user configs
    med - pictures, music, videos
    mnt - usb/sd mountpoints
    nfs - nfs mountpoints
    smb - smb mountpoints
    src - external source code
    tmp - desktop
    


  • The feature request includes the phrase “Behind the scenes there would need to be some cryptographic magic,” because it’s just yet another “I have a sweet idea for an app, bro, I just need you to do the coding for me” pitch.

    The project has 766 contributors with pull requests being accepted all the time. That’s not a walled garden.








  • Forgejo, a Gitea fork used by Codeberg. I chose it because it’s got the right balance of features to weight for my small use case, it has FOSS spirit, and it’s got a lovely package maintainer for FreeBSD that makes deployment and maintenance easy peasy (thanks Stefan <3).



  • mlfhtoLinux*Permanently Deleted*
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    /dev/sda is the whole raw disk - you typically don’t want to directly interact with /dev/sda, unless you are partitioning or overwriting it. There are a few layers between that device and the files:

    • raw disk - /dev/sda
    • disk partition - /dev/sda1
    • luks container - when unlocked, mapped to /dev/mapper/{name}
    • ext4 filesystem inside the luks container, mounted somewhere like /mnt, /media, etc

    You’ll need to find where that ext4 filesystem is mounted, and run the chown command on that. You can run lsblkand see a tree of the above hierarchy, with the ext4 filesystem’s mountpount shown in the right-hand column.


  • mlfhtoMemescatharsis
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    3 months ago

    Nikita Khrushchev, in his own memoir, stating clearly that the USSR could not have won the war on its own:

    I would like to express my candid opinion about Stalin’s views on whether the Red Army and the Soviet Union could have coped with Nazi Germany and survived the war without aid from the United States and Britain. First, I would like to tell about some remarks Stalin made and repeated several times when we were “discussing freely” among ourselves. He stated bluntly that if the United States had not helped us, we would not have won the war. If we had had to fight Nazi Germany one on one, we could not have stood up against Germany’s pressure, and we would have lost the war. No one ever discussed this subject officially, and I don’t think Stalin left any written evidence of his opinion, but I will state here that several times in conversations with me he noted that these were the actual circumstances. He never made a special point of holding a conversation on the subject, but when we were engaged in some kind of relaxed conversation, going over international questions of the past and present, and when we would return to the subject of the path we had traveled during the war, that is what he said. When I listened to his remarks, I was fully in agreement with him, and today I am even more so.

    -Khrushchev, Nikita Sergeevich; Khrushchev, Serge (2004). Memoirs of Nikita Khrushchev: Commissar, 1918–1945. Penn State Press. pp. 638–639.