• 11 Posts
  • 149 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 5th, 2023

help-circle

  • gwilikerstoMovies & TV@hexbear.netIt's so unfair!
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Honeslty, what version of Trek are these people watching that isn’t obviously leftest? TNG and DS9 are pretty left leaning IMO. Perhaps you could argue VOY and ENT are less so. I think they’re less outwardly political at least.

    I was watching a video early today and they pointed out that the Simpsons have become empty signifiers. Their original subserviness has been hollowed out and they basically represent whatever people want them to represent. They’re such a big part of the cultural Zeitgeist that they can mean anything to anyone.

    I suppose one could argue that’s the case for Star Trek, especially if we take into account some of the more modern bastardisations of the brand.

    Then again, another part of me wants to chalk this up to people being dumb. If you listen to RATM and think they’re anything but radically left, anti-establishment and anti-authoritarian, it’s not the product of the greater cultural forces of late capitalism. It’s cuz your dumb.







  • Was talking to this gay woman at a bar and noticed that she would make contradictory claims like saying she was Palestinian and that she was African. She spoke with an SA accent and said she was from SA but subsequently contradicted herself. She was nice but a bit aloof when I asked her any questions about herself. I called her on these contradictions and said that what she was saying didn’t add up.

    Turns out that she was Namibian and that her father was Palestinian. She identified as Palestinian. She said she was aloof about it because most people can’t point to Namibia on a map and that she was tired of her country being a point of prejudice in addition to her sexuality and skin colour so she just said she was from SA to avoid all that.

    So a minor lie but one that thought me a lot about what it must be like for some people in everyday conversations.












  • Christ, imagine propagating The Protocols of the Elders of Zion in 2024. Its got to be one of the most debunked documents in history:

    The spurious character of the Protocols was first revealed in 1921 by Philip Graves of The Times (London), who demonstrated their obvious resemblance to a satire on Napoleon III by the French lawyer Maurice Joly, published in 1864 and entitled Dialogue aux enfers entre Machiavel et Montesquieu (“Dialogue in Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu”). Subsequent investigation, particularly by the Russian historian Vladimir Burtsev, revealed that the Protocols were forgeries compounded by officials of the Russian secret police out of the satire of Joly, a fantastic novel (Biarritz) by Hermann Goedsche (1868), and other sources.

    From Britannica

    They were literally debunked over 100 years ago.