Voluntarily sharing informative posts from unaffiliated sources.

  • 150 Posts
  • 14 Comments
Joined 5 months ago
cake
Cake day: January 16th, 2024

help-circle









  • About Samsung (from Techopedia):

    Not every manufacturer has wholly embraced the idea. iFixit recently dropped its Samsung partnership over allegations the Galaxy phone maker wasn’t much interested in do-it-yourself repairs. 404 Media learned that Samsung required independent repair shops to not only report customers who fix devices with unofficial parts, but to “disassemble” those devices. While right to repair laws don’t necessarily address that behavior, they along with existing warranty law could mandate policy changes.

    About Apple (from The Register):

    The fact that a strong parts pairing prohibition was included in the bill indicates that the practice continues to fall out of favor as more and more localities take action to ban it. Even Apple, which has relied heavily on parts pairing to maintain control of its devices while speaking out of the other side of its mouth about support for right to repair, recently caved to the parts-pairing pressure by announcing it would allow used parts to be installed in some devices.

    However, as iFixit pointed out, Apple’s declaration of allowing some used parts to be used for repairs doesn’t comply with Colorado’s prohibition on parts pairing, nor the version included in a recently passed right to repair bill in Oregon.

    “Apple has made no promises to enable previously blocked functionality for third-party parts, which are also key to independent and DIY repair,” iFixit said. “To be clear, nobody expects Apple to make parts work when they don’t meet the necessary specifications — but currently, Apple blocks functionality of many third-party parts preemptively.”

    In other words, Colorado is another win, but it’s hardly the end of the war.


  • At a committee hearing, opponents of the new law argued that it would endanger the security and reliability of devices by opening up the market to independent shops of dubious quality and making documentation and tools more widely available.

    “The marketplace already provides a wide range of consumer choices for repair with varying levels of quality, price and convenience without the mandates imposed by this legislation. The marketplace continues to evolve and manufacturers will continue to make changes to address consumer demand while offering consumers safe and reliable repair options,” said Michael Blank, director of state legislative affairs for CTIA, the trade association for the wireless communications industry.

    At the hearing, Katz argued the change was necessary because companies were using technology to take more control of the market and block people from making reasonable repairs.

    When you limit choice and you limit freedom to fix the stuff that you own, then that can lead to higher costs. It can also lead to more people deciding it’s just not worth it and buying a whole new thing and … that can have a huge impact on our society from an environmental perspective as well,” he said.