• Jknaraa
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Maybe because it’s about economical efficiency

    Exactly. It’s not about “saving the planet” at all. It is, once again, about making more money.

    • Spzi@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Oh, that’s not what I meant to describe. There are differences in ecological impact of various foods and production methods, obviously. Choosing the smaller options helps to do less harm, to “save the planet”.

      I meant to point out that we moved from pre-industrial methods to modern methods because they make more sense in economic terms, in capitalism. And that just going back might lead to unwanted consequences like lots of people with much less access to meat.