• filoriaOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    11 months ago

    Good riddance. Can’t take a country keen on dollarization into an organization who’s primary goal is dedollarization.

    • El Barto@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      11 months ago

      Why doesn’t south America agree on a single currency like the Euro?

      The Peso. The Sol. The Amero.

    • pearable
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      11 months ago

      It’s the euro even a good idea? Convenient for tourism and trade sure, but according to MMT it hamstrings a countries ability to invest in it’s economy and makes government loans fraught.

      • qyron@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Uh? Who said EU countries can’t contract loans or invest in its economy?

        • pearable
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          I didn’t say they can’t, I said it was fraught. A better phrasing is “can cause issues a non-euro country does not have.” This quote explains what I mean:

          So, in the eurozone a national (federal) government cannot run out of money as long as:

          • tax revenues are high enough to bring the Treasury account back to zero or
          • bond revenues are high enough to bring the Treasury account back to zero or
          • tax and bond revenues together are high enough to bring the Treasury account back to zero.

          This means that a eurozone national government does not run out of money until it has exhausted its tax revenues and bond revenues

          The United States, Great Britain, Japan, and every other fiat currency country don’t have this problem. They are incapable of running out of money. They are capable of making so much money it is completely debased like Weighmar Germany or Zimbabwe. However, those cases are rare and extreme. As long as they ensure the supply of goods people want to buy us sufficient they can spend as much as they want. This enables them to pay off their debts on a whim (if they want to collapse the safest store for money that investors use to outweigh risks).

          Sources:

          The Deficit Myth I’d give you page numbers but I listened to the audiobook https://www.intereconomics.eu/contents/year/2022/number/2/article/modern-monetary-theory-the-right-compass-for-decision-making.html

        • knotted@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          He literally said it’s the MMT. Lmgtfy: https://www.investopedia.com/modern-monetary-theory-mmt-4588060 and it doesn’t even say that companies can’t get loans.

          It just makes it harder to take on debt if you don’t control your own currency as a sovereign state. EU countries are a political union but not a clear fiscal union, with their own treasuries but also the ECB calling the shots and it means that member states can have sanctions imposed on them, like Greece for example.