Genuine question.

I know they were the scrappy startup doing different cool things. But, what are the most major innovative things that they introduced, improved or just implemented that either revolutionized, improved or spurred change?

I am aware of the possibility of both fanboys and haters just duking it out below. But there’s always that one guy who has a fkn well-formatted paragraph of gold. I await that guy.

  • darth_helmet@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    129
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    The graphical user interface.

    They don’t invent it (xerox PARC did), but Apple correctly identified that the user experience of existing computer systems was holding it back from being a thing everyone owns, and made computers a bad fit for many types of work that seem extremely obvious now (digital media creation particularly)

    They did this more or less again with the smartphone: business folks and super nerds were the smartphone market before Apple. Now it’s the average person’s computer.

    • simple@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      66
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The graphical user interface.

      A million times this. Not only did they popularize the ideas, but MacOS’s UI design was so ahead of its time that it’s barely changed since then. It was by far the most polished operating system at the time. Old Apple actually was innovating while the market was kind of stagnant.

      MacOS Leopard screenshot

      This screenshot was in 2007. The competition was Windows Vista. It’s a night and day difference. I had this version of the iMac at the time and was super impressed, even if I did switch back to Windows a couple of years later. Looking back at it, it still looks quite “modern”.

      • Cort@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        1 year ago

        Just to piggy back on this comment, OSX was released before 9/11 and windows XP, so Microsoft was still selling Windows ME at the time! Aside from the desktop backgrounds looked very similar.

      • BigDaddySlim@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ve got an '08 iMac with this version of MacOS, El Capitan I believe. Going from that to my 2019 M1 MBP running Sonoma is really no different. Sure there’s features missing but I can still sync my notes and the few other Apple things I actually use between the two.

        Plus my iPods can still sync with both devices, they just moved iPod into Finder in the new versions.

        • DJDarren@thelemmy.club
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          It still blows my mind that Apple are so happy to drop OS support on iPhones and iPads that are considered too old, but I can still sync my 4th gen iPod with my M2 Air. There’s damn near 20 years between those two devices, but aside from needing a USB A>C dongle, they work together without any trouble.

          • Josh@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Well, I will say it’s a little different. Your iPod doesn’t get software updates or apps. From a functional standpoint it’s about as supported as any old iPhone or iPad is.

            • DJDarren@thelemmy.club
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yes, that’s very true.

              It does make me laugh when it tells me that my iPods’ various softwares are up to date, and that it’ll check again next time. You can check, but you’ll not find anything…

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well, KDE3 could look cool too.

        I’ll admit, back then I really wanted a Mac.

        Just after trying to use them a few times I know that behavior is more important than appearance on screenshots. Also such looks exhaust you emotionally.

      • yesdogishere@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        37
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Wrong wrong wrong. Macontoshs gui was crap and buggy as hell. Every seasoned it expert knew it was a shit lousy interface designed to dupe people into believing it was secure when in fact it proliferated viruses and security holes, and drove the control of computing into an avaricious humanity destroying company culture known as apple. DO NOT EVER PROMOTE THE GUI AS GOOD. ITS CRAP.

        • simple@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          24
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          buggy as hell

          No it wasn’t

          viruses and security holes

          That has nothing to do with GUI

          • 520@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            No it wasn’t

            OSX 10.0 in general actually was. Jobs offered 10.1 for free as an apology, and it fixed a lot of things.

    • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They don’t invent it (xerox PARC did), but Apple correctly identified that the user experience of existing computer systems was holding it back

      Fucking everyone except Xerox BOD figured that out.

    • yesdogishere@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      50
      ·
      1 year ago

      Wrong wrong wrong. The graphical user interface is crap and will always be crap. The whole matter of popularity is marketing bunkum. Console command interface was al ways faster and better than any gui for general computing tasks. The gui is fine for office tasks, but shit for everything else. The popularity of the gui today has driven a massive upscale of cruddy bloated virus infected software. The fact that most people now only know gui has meant that control of viruses has slipped away. Had console commands been the mainstay for computing, viruses and security holes would never have been allowed to proliferate as they do today.

      • DuckOverload@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Bud, you sound like a technophile geek. The kind of person who custom built his own computer. You’re not the target customer. Apple builds products for people that don’t care about technology, they just care about what the technology does and want it to be easy and seamless. And that is a vast majority of the people.

        • PrMinisterGR
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          I built my own computer but as a working laptop there is nothing close to a decked out MacBook Pro. Yes, I’m aware of the price, but my company paid it, and it was a good choice from every angle.

      • skulblaka@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        While you may be correct I think you’re still missing the point. CLI is for super nerds. While you and I may know how to use it, the average person doesn’t, and is unlikely to put in the effort to learn. That is the innovation that Apple made in bringing computing to the mainstream. It was precisely because people didn’t have to learn how to navigate the CLI environment and instead got an easy point-and-click interface that computers caught on with the public at large, and that gained Apple an absolute ton of cash money and noteriety.

        • ∟⊔⊤∦∣≶@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Awww… I’m a supernerd? Thank yoooooou ❤️ ❤️ ❤️

          I always considered myself to be kind of an average run-of-the-mill nerd.

        • olympicyes@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          OS X has a decent terminal app and has zsh included as default shell. Mac OS 9 effectively had no CLI at all.

      • maxprime
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The first virus was made in 1986 for IBM personal computers. Nothing is free from computer viruses. Not macOS, not iOS, not Android, not GNU/Linux, not freeBSD, not even an IBM PC from the 80s. All software can be exploited. The only reason GUI software is the most exploited is because it is what people use. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brain_(computer_virus)

        GUI is not only intended for office tasks. In fact, I would argue that many office tasks are better suited for command line, but I’ll agree that nobody knows how to do that anymore.

        GUI was always best suited for artists. Apple has, for a long time, especially since OSX, been explicit about catering to artists. Can you imagine editing video in a terminal? Or editing a layered image? Or producing music?

        • DJDarren@thelemmy.club
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Can you imagine editing video in a terminal? Or editing a layered image? Or producing music?

          I genuinely can’t. How atrocious would that be?