I’ve previously said here that mass vaccination is a crucial tool in disease control, but that enforced vaccination has some problems. The first five I’m just listing, because I think everyone should be aware of them. I know some are controversial, but I’m not planning to discuss them here. The last one is IMO the most interesting.

Misc issues, not the subject of this post

  • civil rights - forcing medical treatment on people is normally a serious crime, but for whatever reason people seem to make an exception for vaccination.

  • utility - politicians usually don’t think so, but people generally make better decisions for themselves than politicians will make for them

  • fragility - when everybody is forced to do the same thing at the same time, and problems with it are immediately big problems. Like when the CDC mandated one covid test kit, but the kit was defective, and hospitals were prohibited from using different non-approved kits. It’s better for people to have access to several options, in case the mandated one has some flaw.

  • incentivisation (1) - a government which cannot enforce a rule has to convince people to follow the rule. So it has an incentive to make high quality rules. You can then measure whether the rule really works for people by measuring the compliance by demographic.

  • incentivitation (2) - many people will resist or ignore a command from an authority. They are much more likely to obey good convincing advice from an authority.

The real subject of this post

  • trolley problem

You can guess that a novel vaccine will have unexpected side effects and will kill some number of people. You should, because every medical intervention has a non-zero mortality rate, with very rare exceptions like acupuncture.

So the vaccine will save X deaths and cause Y deaths. Nobody can know what X and Y are, except that X is much bigger than Y. This sounds like the trolley problem.

I used to think that providing access to vaccines is good. People can make their own decisions to take the risk, based on their personal risk profiles and doctor’s advice. But if the president or minister forces people to do something that kills Y people, the president/minister is responsible for those deaths. The only question would be what level of culpability he would have.

So my question.

Does instead framing it as a trolley problem hold water? If so, does that debunk the criminal argument? Or is there maybe a hybrid perspective or a different one, that’s even more solid?

  • @ttmrichter
    link
    12 years ago

    You should, because every medical intervention has a non-zero mortality rate, with very rare exceptions like acupuncture.

    [citation needed]

    • @roastpotatothiefOPM
      link
      12 years ago

      Is that not self-evident? It seemed obvious to me as I was writing it, but I’m not sure I could find a way to prove it.

      But I think you can still try to answer the main question, even if you don’t believe that assersion.

      • @ttmrichter
        link
        22 years ago

        Is that not self-evident?

        Nope. There is puncturing in acupuncture. (Hint: it’s in the name.) If the needles aren’t fully sterilized, there’s serious potential for the transmission of pathogens. It would stagger credulity that in the thousands of years it has been practiced literally every application—a count likely up in the realm of 9 digits or so—was done to sterile perfection.

        … I think you can still try to answer the main question …

        I could but I won’t bother. Trolley problems are fun little puzzles for academic wankery. Using them in matters of public policy is just stupid.

        • @roastpotatothiefOPM
          link
          12 years ago

          Normally, when something sounds stupid, it’s because you haven’t understood it.

          • @ttmrichter
            link
            12 years ago

            Normally when you opine like that, you sound stupid.

  • @Blinky
    link
    1
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    deleted by creator

  • @Blinky
    link
    1
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    deleted by creator

    • @roastpotatothiefOPM
      link
      02 years ago

      The utilitarian thing would be locking everyone in individual pens out in the wilderness, parents separated from children, feeding them only sterilised food.

      We’re halfway there already.

      Utilitarianism is egregious. Any crime is excusable - you just have to think of some rationale, whereby it is for the greater good.