• @iBaz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      986 months ago

      What can he do about it? We live in a free market society. All he can do is keep talking about it and hope the people get the message. Rebellion will start at the consumer level and go up, not the other way around. Main problem is the millions of people that rely on Fox for their news.

      • @Deiv@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        156 months ago

        Damn there is nothing the government can do. Sorry guys :( You’ll just have to buy less food, and maybe then the corporations will get the hint!

        Regulations? Laws against price gauging? Naw, they can’t do that. It’s the consumers that are at fault!

        • @iBaz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          156 months ago

          Do you think Biden makes the laws? Did you fail civics class? I said nothing about enacting laws making what these companies are doing illegal, I only said Biden can’t do much about it.

          • @MsPenguinette@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            126 months ago

            He can propose laws to the legislative bramch. He might not be able to pass it himself but he could push and advocate for it

              • @conductor
                link
                -7
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                Oh what does it hurt then?

                Can’t say anything, because of the GOP.

                Super cool having a democrat president who’s got no balls. Can’t offend the house.

                • prole
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  46 months ago

                  What does it hurt? Political capital, for one.

                  Also, you don’t just say, “let’s make a law about X”, and a 3,000 page bill just appears in front of you. That shit takes TONS of work. Biden can’t just materialize a workable plan that both parties (in this political climate? lol) will ever agree on.

                  That just isn’t how this country works. If you want this to change, Congress has to change it.

        • Cethin
          link
          fedilink
          English
          126 months ago

          It’s within congress’s powers for sure. I don’t think the president. Congress has done it in the past though, so they for sure can again.

        • @money_loo@1337lemmy.com
          link
          fedilink
          66 months ago

          Why is this upvoted?

          No, the president of the United States cannot unilaterally implement price controls on goods without the involvement of Congress. Price controls typically involve changes to laws and regulations, which fall under the legislative branch’s authority. Congress would need to pass legislation granting such powers or specifically authorizing the president to implement price controls in certain circumstances.

        • @SCB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          -6
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Price controls are an extremely radical concept, themselves. Last thing this economy needs is further distortion.

          The sucky thing about inflation is you have to run through it like an illness.

          • @Natanael@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            5
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            Windfall taxes. Let them share their gains, that’s the whole point of taxes since society don’t work otherwise.

            • @SCB@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              36 months ago

              That’s vastly different from a direct price control, in both intent and effect.

              I’d love to pass lots more taxes but with the current House that’s completely impossible

        • prole
          link
          fedilink
          English
          9
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Do you know basic US Civics, or…? Biden has the bully pulpit (basically what he’s doing here), and that’s pretty much it. He can issue executive orders (and has in the past about this), but those are often complete bullshit that’s unenforceable, and will be removed by the next person in the office.

          Take a look at Trump rolling back Obama’s EPA purview over waterways in the US for a recent example that has left over 60% of our nation’s waterways now unprotected.

        • @Ranvier@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          66 months ago

          Do you want a dictatorship or something? Congress writes laws, talk to your members of congress.

    • @pan_troglodytes@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      28
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      that was basically it. short of siccing the irs on them there’s not a lot the executive branch can do about it… of course that’d kill the golden goose named “campaign contributions”, so it wont happen

    • @takeda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      236 months ago

      It will be harder to pass new laws in the current Congress, but he still has control over the executive branch. Hopefully some existing laws could be used.

      • @mosiacmango@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        53
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        He appointed the most aggressive FTC head in decades who is using the antitrust law we have to currently go after Google and Amazon.

        She’s also fighting a merger between Kroger and Albertsons, which would drastically raise grocery prices.

        The FTC is also fighting the hedge fund buyout of preciously independent healthcare clinics, which has massively ramped up medical costs.

        Not to mention breaking the real estate agent fee monopoly.

        His executive branch has been busy as hell trying to help people.

    • @TheDubz87@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      -106 months ago

      I mean, you wouldn’t want the politicians to lose their legal bribes generous donations over acting in our interests instead of the corporations, would you?

      Will someone please think of the rich folks pockets?

      • @forrgott@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        16 months ago

        How is it possible that people don’t understand the implied “/s” here??? Or am I missing some other reason for the downvotes?

        FWIW, I thought your comment was great. Gave me quite a chuckle! :-D

        • @money_loo@1337lemmy.com
          link
          fedilink
          46 months ago

          Because this is just more of that “enlightened centrist both sides baaaaaaad” bullshit that dumbasses invoke whenever they want to diminish the power of one side, thus actually strengthening the other side, while claiming that they don’t care about sides at all, even though they just can’t stop themselves from only sputtering it out when it’s the dems doing something.

          And after trump if you still believe both sides are the same then you are certifiably brain dead.

        • @Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          16 months ago

          How is it possible that people don’t understand the implied “/s” here???

          They understand it and are angry because they’re being called out.

        • @TheDubz87@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          -46 months ago

          It’s because I said bad things about Biden, even though I was talking about politicians as a whole. But you can’t say bad things about Biden or be any kind of critical about the current administration without getting trashed on here.

      • @Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        286 months ago

        Oh and passed an executive order, along with having his justice department pursue more antitrust cases than any other administration.

    • @FakinUpCountryDegen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      -176 months ago

      All he can do is back out his limp-dick economic policies that are destroying the country and creating this problem…but there’s no chance of that.

      This damage is literally the point of the policies. What people don’t understand is that he’s doing this on purpose.

  • @_lilith@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    1176 months ago

    So the attorney general can open an investigation on this asshat profiteering off of hand sanitizer but when it comes to companies price gouging in the wake of the pandemic we get this limp dick response? Sure I’m glad he said something but we need more

    • @ZombieTheZombieCat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      106 months ago

      Apparently a state of emergency needs to have been declared for them to actually do anything about price gouging directly.

      I read about it when Southwest airlines went completely down for a week last year over the holidays and I was stranded somewhere. Other airlines had astronomical prices and car rentals were over $500 for one day. It was disgusting. But apparently there was nothing to be done.

      They need to change the rules surrounding it because they’re not working. But any amount of government intervention in the economy gets conservatives screaming about “communism,” or socialism, or whatever scapegoat they’re using that day that they don’t know the actual definition of. And yet, if there’s no government intervention in the economy it’s “Biden’s not doing enough/Biden is personally raising gas prices every week” etc.

      Of course there wasn’t a single peep from them when Trump was fucking shit up, other than those “this is Biden’s America” memes when Biden hadn’t even taken office yet and the photos were a year old. Nothing will get done about it as long as conservatives have any say in congress. But they’ll always be the one’s complaining and pointing the finger at “the libruls” while profiting.

    • @Donjuanme@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      256 months ago

      I’d be surprised if even saying this didn’t have political ramifications. There’s nothing, besides; military budget, tax breaks to millionaires, and their own pay raises, that would get through both houses of Congress right now.

      Asking nicely is at least virtue signaling, maybe it’ll be something we can address if a couple R’s ever see the consequences of their illegal actions.

      • FlashMobOfOne
        link
        fedilink
        126 months ago

        L-O-L

        He could threaten to cancel federal contracts with any vendor found to be price gouging. That would have actual ramifications and doesn’t require Congress.

        The president isn’t powerless here. He just wants credit for purely performative actions.

        • @wreel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          206 months ago

          The price gouging is mainly coming from consumer facing markets, not government contracts. Even with discretionary spending there isn’t that much that pure executive branch actions can do to dissuade the price gouging that we’ve been seeing.

          • @T00l_shed@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            66 months ago

            Well to be fair, there is A LOT of price gouging from government contracts, but they just print the money for it so they don’t REALLY care.

            • FlashMobOfOne
              link
              fedilink
              36 months ago

              Yup.

              If the President threatened to void federal contracts, you’d see immediate change.

              But the president doesn’t work for us.

              • @Serinus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                66 months ago

                void federal contracts

                I’m sure Walmart and Chipotle are shaking in their boots. I guess a president DID get McDonald’s delivered to the White House once.

                • FlashMobOfOne
                  link
                  fedilink
                  26 months ago

                  Never fails to amuse me the extent to which people make excuses for the leader of the free world.

        • @MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          36 months ago

          I agree. Angry orange man was known for pushing every single loophole to make bad things happen.

          If Joebob wanted to actually do something about it, he’d find a way to work it through the system. Isn’t that the point of politics??

          • FlashMobOfOne
            link
            fedilink
            26 months ago

            I despise Trump, but yes, I’d love to see a Democratic president who is actually willing to wield power.

            Would also be nice to see 49% of voters no longer content to make excuses and vote Green instead.

    • In presidential systems like the US has legislation originates from congress. The President only has veto power over legislation, and controls the enforcement of existing legislation. They can’t force congress to create new legislation, though of course they can propose legislation (anyone can do that). This is very different from parliamentary systems where the Prime Minister is the head of the majority party of the parliament, and can thus directly propose legislation and get their party to support it.

    • @Neil
      link
      English
      96 months ago

      He probably went to go buy his own ice cream for the first time in 3 years and said “holy shit.”

  • @firewyre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    296 months ago

    Dude, they are gouging because they want you gone so they can have more tax breaks. Fuck then over already.

        • @Serinus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          15
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Oh cool. When is that passing the Senate?

          Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) is cosponsoring the legislation in the Senate, and Rep. Jamaal Bowman (D-N.Y.) will introduce companion legislation in the House of Representatives.

          • @ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            5
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            It won’t pass, but if Biden can put the blame of it failing on Republicans it could help win elections.

            That’s something realistic he could do. For an unrealistic but satisfying option, he could pick the worst offender and make that company an example. Send every OSHA, EPA, and IRS agent they can get to swarm the company and bury them in fines and legal actions.

            • @Serinus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              26 months ago

              Using agencies as weapons like that outside of their intended purpose is… despotic.

              I don’t know that it’s wise to take attention away from the Republicans own clusterfuck to place it on something the Dems can’t get done.

              I’m with you in spirit; I just think there are more layers to this than we tend to give it credit for.

              • @MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                66 months ago

                I don’t think they meant “use agencies as bully goons.”

                More like, those agencies are usually left under-resourced and under-staffed, so many companies flagrantly violate safety and employment laws because it’s more profitable to just make more money and pay off an unlikely fine if they get caught.

                So, if you focused all the existing attention of those agencies on the worst companies, they’d find tons of legitimate lawbreaking going on, and hopefully punish the crap out of said company.

                But, you know how it is “You stole how many millions in employee wages?!?.. that’s $25,000 penalty for you, company. Naughty naughty!”

                • @Mirshe@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  26 months ago

                  Exactly, even if they do get caught, the fines are so goddamn low it’s barely worth it. A warehouse in my city got caught using 11-year-olds in their labor force, including having them driving forklifts. Their penalty? The kids can’t work there anymore and the company that owned the warehouse got a $30k fine.

              • @stewie3128@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                46 months ago

                It’s exactly what Republicans would do if they didn’t like a company. Playing nice with these people is what got us to this point.

                • AutistoMephisto
                  link
                  fedilink
                  26 months ago

                  Exactly. With apologies to Michelle Obama, “They go low, we go high!” does not work. It was never intended to work.

                  Democrats have a ton of sportsmanship trophies, and what do Republicans have? Well, they’ve got the SCOTUS, the House, and tons of State governments.

              • @ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                -16 months ago

                It’s despotic to direct agencies to perform the tasks they were specifically created to perform? I don’t think so.

                It’s not something that Biden would realistically do or that I think should be done in this situation, but it is far from despotic.

      • @korny@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        66 months ago

        Maybe add a pretty please in front of the request if he isn’t going to take any forceful action.

      • @hydrospanner@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        46 months ago

        Pick the worst offender corporation, invite their whole executive board to DC, and when they arrive, guillotine them on the white house lawn.

        …then repeat this request.

  • BarterClub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    236 months ago

    Stop slapping and start jailing. No teeth will never stop this.

    • @Serinus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      16 months ago

      You generally want laws to do that kind of thing. Good luck trying to get a price fixing law through the House.

      • @stewie3128@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        36 months ago

        We have antitrust laws. Republicans and neoliberals have de-funded the agencies that would enforce those laws to the extent that they can’t take action on 99% of what’s happening.

  • @ExfilBravo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    11
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    "If only my donors would pretty please stop that would be great. Consequences? We need to keep the elderly out of government, and ban lobbying. Until we do BOTH of those things, nothing will change and will only get worse. VOTE.