• Kinetix@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 years ago

    Bahaha… No, @redbook is as qualified to do so as the next average Joe.

    If you meant ‘anger’, it’s not meant to be so… Misinformation spreading, which is still attempting to happen in spades in this thread, is very frustrating. There is absolutely tons to be learned in relation to this virus and medicine that can deal with it, it’s an ongoing science experiment. But laymen seeking their own treatments on what medicines they’d like to take or not and pushing the nonsense end of it online as if their opinion matters in the world of medicine, is mostly unhelpful, and leads people down the roads of consuming horse dewormer, bleach, or hydroxychloroquine.

    • roastpotatothief
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 years ago

      i could explain about what scientific method is, what makes a piece of research valid, how to judge the meaning and validity of a result. so you can filter out all the contradictory science and get to the truth. but doesn’t sound like you’d be interested.

      I’m taking about understanding a subject matter, not getting personal medical advice.

      but you seem to be conscientiously anti science, or at least against certain types of science/research. this is really unusual, if it’s true. what is the thinking there? what kind of background leads you to this ideological place?

      • Kinetix@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 years ago

        i could explain about what scientific method is, what makes a piece of research valid, how to judge the meaning and validity of a result. so you can filter out all the contradictory science and get to the truth. but doesn’t sound like you’d be interested.

        What are your qualifications?

        Are you qualified to determine a fraudulent study?

        Have you read any meta-analysis that suggests that promoting Ivermectin (+ anything) for COVID treatment has any actual benefit?

        The notion that I’m against science is ridiculous - I’m against unqualified individuals spreading misinformation, that’s it.

        • roastpotatothief
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 years ago

          Are you qualified to determine a fraudulent study?

          that’s not a real qualification you can get. like a certificate of fraudulent study identifying?

          i do really know what you mean. i understand what you’re trying to say. but it’s so off topic and such a big topic. let’s leave that argument for another day.

          The notion that I’m against science is ridiculous

          okay nevermind then. you gave off that impression. I’d love to talk seriously with one of these people, but either they are hard to find or they don’t admit to it.