Israel, the United States and Hamas are close to an agreement to free dozens of women and children held hostage in Gaza, in exchange for the first sustained pause in conflict in Gaza, according to people familiar with its provisions.

  • girlfreddy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    From the BBC

    Meanwhile, the White House has responded to a report in the Washington Post which said Israel, Hamas and the US were on the verge of a deal that would see the release of women and children seized by Hamas on 7 October in exchange for a five-day pause in fighting.

    A White House spokesperson said no such deal had yet been reached but it was working hard to get one agreed.

  • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    More than 100 countries — but, notably, not the United States — have called for a full and immediate cease-fire.

    And yet the us brokered the deal.

    • Evilcoleslaw@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      A ceasefire is generally a step towards more permanent peace, although obviously they’re also violated quite a bit. A pause implies from the outset that it is temporary to allow civilians to exit combat zones and hopefully for humanitarian aid to reach those in need.

  • queermunist she/her
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    61
    ·
    1 year ago

    Five days isn’t enough, but maybe can be stretched out to a real ceasefire by further negotiation?

    If Biden pulls off a ceasefire I’m voting for him. If he doesn’t, I won’t. Simple as.

    • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      How is Biden personally responsible for what is going on with Israel and Hamas? Israel came into existence in 1942, Biden was a child at the time, and not even elected into the Senate until 1972 a full 30 years after Israel policies were in motion.

      I’m not making excuses for any support of Israel’s actions, but it’s a little reductive to blame this all on one dude. (Which you’re kind of doing in other parts of this thread)

      Let’s not forget there’s a real concerted effort by the republican party right now to turn this country into a Fascist one party state, and they’ve plainly stated that their plan is to go after people critical of the state and political enemies if elected, which could be you and me.

      I wouldn’t take that threat lightly.

      • masquenox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        How is Biden personally responsible for what is going on

        Every US president since the 70s has been complicit in enabling Israel’s crimes - and that includes Biden.

          • masquenox@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            So which part of…

            Every US president since the 70s has been complicit in enabling Israel’s crimes - and that includes Biden.

            …didn’t you get the first time around?

    • Nougat@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because what two foreign powers decide to do is totally Biden’s responsibility?

      • queermunist she/her
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        29
        ·
        1 year ago

        When it comes to Israel? Absolutely. That’s the 51st state, our own little monster that we’ve fed and created.

        • Nougat@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Puerto Rico, American Samoa, Guam, US Virgin Islands, Northern Mariana Islands, and Washington DC have entered the chat.

        • PugJesus@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          14
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s the 51st state, our own little monster that we’ve fed and created.

          Jesus Christ. Imagine believing that.

          • girlfreddy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Imagine not believing that … esp since “the United States has given Israel more than $260 billion in combined military and economic aid since World War II, plus about $10 billion more in contributions for missile defense systems like the Iron Dome, a U.S. News analysis finds”. source

              • masquenox@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Egypt is a US client state - is this really the first time you’ve heard of this stuff?

                • PugJesus@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  10
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Goodness me, I suppose the EU is made of US client states as well, and Japan, and South Korea, and Latin America, and MENA, and most of Africa, and Southeast Asia. Really, anytime anyone does anything you don’t like, unless they’re Russia, Iran, India, or China, you can just decry them as America’s 51st state. Very convenient. I’m sure India will be added to the “American Capitalist Lapdogs” before long, though. Not enough saber-rattling for your kind.

          • masquenox@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Without US support Israel wouldn’t last a month - Israel is a shining example of US “foreign policy.” Just like Saudi Arabia.

            • PugJesus@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              Right, do you not remember how the last attempts to dislodge Israel went, back when Israel went without significant US support?

              • masquenox@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Are you talking about the Yom Kippu war, perhaps? That war Israel only survived due to the massive support it received from the US?

                Is that the time you are talking about?

                • PugJesus@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  … you do realize that the Yom Kippur War had already shifted in Israel’s favor by the time (limited) American support arrived, and that the Arab states were backed materially by the Soviet fucking Union, right?

            • yetAnotherUser@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Israel has nukes, you know? That’s a pretty solid deterrent, especially if you don’t have anything to lose.

          • kttnpunk@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I personally have a lot more trouble believing the u.s isn’t a colossal imperialistic empire but a lot of people do seem alarmingly ignorant of this fact.

          • queermunist she/her
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            12
            ·
            1 year ago

            Imagine believing Israel is somehow able to survive without a steady supply of support from the entire Western world.

            If the US pulled support, pretty much every NATO country would do the same thing. They’d be alone in the world in a region surrounded by countries opposed to Zionism. Hell, just take those warships out of the Gulf and things would turn very quickly.

            • PugJesus@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              “every NATO country would do the same thing”

              Who else is materially supporting Israel in NATO, again?

              Is NATO just the fucking illuminati, at this point, as an excuse for everything you don’t like?

              Do you not remember what happened in the first twenty-five years of Israel’s existence?

              Do you not know how US-Israel relations were in that period?

              … do you know anything about the history of this region?

              • queermunist she/her
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                10
                ·
                1 year ago

                Who else is materially supporting Israel in NATO, again?

                Diplomatic support matters, but also, the UK has sent ships and planes to support Israel, the European Union’s executive arm announced it was suspending all aid to the Palestinian territories, Germany offers Israel military help and promises to crack down at home on support for Hamas , like are you serious?

                Also, this is not the 1950s! You’re living in the past, the Israel of today is run by the soft sons of the ones who conquered Palestine. Their soldiers aren’t warriors, they’re concentration camp guards and dronies and desk jockies. There’s a reason they’ve lost tanks trying to take Gaza.

                • PugJesus@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Diplomatic support matters, but also, the UK has sent ships and planes to support Israel, the European Union’s executive arm announced it was suspending all aid to the Palestinian territories, Germany offers Israel military help and promises to crack down at home on support for Hamas , like are you serious?

                  I made the comment in response to “Imagine believing Israel is somehow able to survive without a steady supply of support from the entire Western world.”

                  Show me the steady supply of support from NATO countries other than the US, not the immediate reaction to a civilian massacre.

                  Also, this is not the 1950s! You’re living in the past, the Israel of today is run by the soft sons of the ones who conquered Palestine. Their soldiers aren’t warriors, they’re concentration camp guards and dronies and desk jockies. There’s a reason they’ve lost tanks trying to take Gaza.

                  “Soft sons”, “their soldiers aren’t warriors”

                  Jesus Christ. And tankies wonder why people call them red fash.

            • Zoboomafoo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              If Isreal gets put into a bad spot they’ll start turning cities to glass, so maybe the status quo isn’t too bad

              • PugJesus@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                1 year ago

                IF the Samson Option is real, it categorically cannot be acquiesced to, as doing so would legitimize the use of nuclear terror as a means of foreign policy.

      • Uranium3006@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        19
        ·
        1 year ago

        don’t shame people into voting for shit, fix your bad candidate problem. bad candidates scare off swing voters in the suburbs worse than progressive candidates

        • osarusan@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          If you’re given the option to lessen the chance of the greatest evil happening by merely pushing a button, and you think “naah I’m not gunna,” then you absolutely should feel shame. If your inaction supports the greater evil coming to power, absolutely shame on you.

        • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          So trump is a better candidate in your eyes?

          Because that is who you are effectively voting for if you don’t vote Biden next year

      • queermunist she/her
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        29
        ·
        1 year ago

        I will not vote for genocide. That’s my red line. If you vote for the lesser of two genocides you’re still voting for genocide.

        If Biden actually manages to stop Israel from continuing its genocide he has my vote! That’s all it would take and that is not a high bar.

        • lennybird@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          24
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          So you vote for nothing and the worst of the two gets in anyway. The family who would’ve otherwise lived in the ‘lesser genocide’ thanks you. In what realm does that make sense?

          • osarusan@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            These “red line” commenters are so blinded by their own purity tests that they can’t see they’re actually supporting the greater genocide. Every thread here on lemmy is full of them, and they all make the same case, but they refuse to acknowledge the actual reality, which is that not voting for the one person who has an actual chance to beat Trump, they’re actually supporting him. Not as much as they would if they actually voted for him, but still significantly.

            If Trump wins by a narrow margin, it will be because of these red-liners who valued their own purity over the lives of others.

              • osarusan@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                In a way, there’s an argument to be made there. If you’re not doing everything you can to help defeat evil, then you are allowing that evil some amount of support.

                On the other hand, your vote is black and white. By not voting for the one person who has an actual chance to beat Trump, your actions are inarguably are supporting Trump.

                • queermunist she/her
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  16
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Your money is black and white too. By not donating to the one person that has an actual chance to beat Trump, your actions are unarguably supporting Trump. Similarly! By not volunteering your time to the one person that has an actual chance to beat Trump…

                  Zero. Difference.

          • queermunist she/her
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            18
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m voting downticket for Democrats so they hinder Trump.

            I won’t vote for genocide. I’d rather kill myself.

            • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Trump literally led a violent insurrection to stay in power.

              Vote for local government and representatives. But they aren’t going to be able to do much when the Nazis come marching again

        • PotatoKat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          My family is Palestinian. Don’t use my people as an excuse to not vote biden. We are all voting for him because we understand how much worse Trump will be. Understand that if Trump wins and you didn’t vote biden (the only other viable candidate) you are just as responsible for what he does as the people who voted for him

          If you don’t do the bare minimum to stop the worst possible outcome (ticking a small fucking box on election day) then you are complicit in the outcome.

        • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Trump is already talking about basically ethnically cleansing the us in the context of mass deportation of immigrants and other parts of his “platform”.

          It is less “voting for the lesser of two genocides”. It is preventing the ones you can.

          • queermunist she/her
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            17
            ·
            1 year ago

            And by threatening to withhold my vote I’m trying to prevent further genocide in Gaza. We’ve already forced Biden this far, we can force him farther if he realizes it could cost him the election.

            So, no ceasefire, no votes.

            By voting blue-no-matter-who, you’re just making Biden worse.

            • eoddc5@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              If Biden doesn’t get the ceasefire, you won’t vote for him

              But who would you vote for, then?

              No other candidates, Democrat or Republican, that run again Biden will be able to get the ceasefire, either - come time to vote.

              So….you won’t vote at all?

              • queermunist she/her
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                14
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                I’ll vote downticket for Democrats and write Hillary Clinton in to the Presidential spot.

                Democrats in the House and Senate would rein in Trump and it’s still Her turn!!!

                • eoddc5@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Not against her as a candidate, but you know writing her in will just waste a vote.

                  There’s also no promise that if she were in the potus seat right now that she could definitively broker a ceasefire. We don’t know how any of it would work with anyone else.

                  Let’s give Biden a chance.

                  (Btw im all for voting for another deserving candidate who runs against him on the Democratic ticket)

                • PugJesus@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Clinton. You’d vote for Clinton in this theoretical scenario as to who would get your vote in negotiating a ceasefire as president during this crisis.

                  The Hillary Clinton who has expressly opposed a ceasefire during this very crisis.

                  That Clinton.

            • PotatoKat@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Ah so the solution is to let the person who will make it worse and officially start the trans genocide within the US win. You’re so smart. Your intelligence eclipses everyone else’s here. If you can’t stop 1 genocide let’s just let 2 happen while the other gets worse. Genius. Absolutely genius.

            • queermunist she/her
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              14
              ·
              1 year ago

              I feel shame for being American and not laying down my life to oppose this demon shithole.

                • queermunist she/her
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  10
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  I won’t be young forever. Hell I’m not sure if I’m even still young now.

                  Good idea. Thanks for your support. I hope you join me.

              • osarusan@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I mean, you do you. But dying also won’t help stop Trump.

                Voting on the other hand…

    • Madison420@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      And thus is why politics in the us are dogshit. Single issue voters are objectively idiots.