I already have heared about Bottles sandboxing capabilities, but, how this differs from standard Flatpak sandboxing system? Is really secure execute any Windows Software using Bottles? (yes, every machine have his vulnerabilities blah blah)

  • macniel@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Huh? Why do you compare bottles, which is a way of simplifying running windows applications via wine, with flatpaks which contains native linux applications?

    • ★ 𝐑𝐮𝐢𝐤𝐤𝐚𝐚𝐏𝐫𝐮𝐬 ★OP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because Bottles is distributed via Flatpak, which is…

      Safe. Sandboxed.

      Because…

      Your bottles are isolated from the system and will only hit your personal files when you decide.

      The full-sandbox is provided and pre-configured only using the Flatpak package (highly recommended).

      All other packages still have access to the partial sandbox which isolates the bottle files and prevents them from accessing your homedir.

      (This is a extract from the official homepage in the last section)

        • ShiningWing@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          None of those are official though, the Flatpak is the only officially supported Bottles version, and the sandboxing is one reason why they recommend using the Flatpak

    • GustavoM@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Apparently the “logic” behind this is simply, “because both isolate stuff”.