• PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Some of them are calling themselves “Anarcho-communist” or like this “Anarchist-communist”. We even had one here few days ago which used both anarchy symbol and H&S.

    • SovereignState@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 years ago

      Just as Sanderites have watered down the meaning of “socialism”, so too have anarchists watered down the meaning of “communism” with this silliness. I almost appreciate the higher level of honesty from “post-leftists” or “anarcho-syndicalists”, at least they’re less likely to actually say “that wasn’t reaaaal communism, real communism is when bandit warlords raze villages and commit pogroms”.

    • CannotSleep420@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’ve seen anarchildren say the already ridiculous claim that Marx supported anarchism. That user was trying to say that Lenin supported anarchism. How long before we start seeing anarcho-Stalinism?

  • sinovictorchan@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 years ago

    That claim is made by the Liberals, their tankiejerker alias, and their “we live in an anti-imperialist country so our slanders that we copied from the American government against anti-imperialism should be creditable” alias all rely on the assumptions that their listeners receive all their information about the world from Western European diaspora schools and fake news from Western European and Western European emigrants. They also need to use fake identities to misappropriate ‘Anarchism’, Trotskism, and Communism for their militarilistic imperialist racist Western European agenda to gain fake credibility for the Liberal slanders. If the brainwashed people did hear the unaltered testimony of the real Communists, then the slanders by Liberals will fall apart since the slanders is all about strawmaning for imagined polices that the Communist governments in history had never support in reality.

    For one example, Socialism is not about government intervention, but about government by working class against Capitalism which is plutocratic government by a few rich free riders. For a second example, Communist countries do not immediately proceed to the final stage of Communism without the proper material conditions and they will make polices that benefit either the people or economic progress at the current material conditions. For a third example, the Communist governments in history do not follow the American redefinition of ‘dictatorship’ from American school textbooks in the ‘dictatorship of the proletariat’.