• HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Kind of. The problem with Chinese terms is that they are very long term. There is also no form of technology transfer as is typical in Western contracts.

    The Chinese model has some pluses to it, but there are some minuses to it as well which don’t really show themselves immediately.

    • zerfuffle
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Technology transfer and austerity. Sort of sounds contradictory, doesn’t it?

      • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        And yet it is usually a condition in a lot of IMF contracts that local labor be used in the construction of local works, including being taught how to.

        In contrast, China sells turn-key systems mostly designed and built by Chinese labor save for some low skill items like earthwork.