Iran’s Foreign Minister Hossein Amir-Abdollahian has warned Israel that the Middle East could spiral out of control if it does not stop strikes on Gaza.

He said the US was also “to blame” for providing military support to Israel.

Hours later, Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu warned troops his people were in a battle for their lives and said the war against Hamas was “do or die”.

    • zerfuffle
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      When you overthrow all the democratically-elected regimes because of “socialism” and replace them with right-wing Islamic fundamentalist maniacs, you do tend to destabilize the region. A stable Middle East could have been a global power like Europe or Russia.

    • Allseer@futurology.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      dude its not the easterners killing its the westerners the majority demographic that are blowing up everyone and their momerz

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Iran’s Foreign Minister Hossein Amir-Abdollahian has warned Israel that the Middle East could spiral out of control if it does not stop strikes on Gaza.

    “I warn the US and its proxy Israel that if they do not immediately stop the crime against humanity and genocide in Gaza, anything is possible at any moment and the region will go out of control,” Mr Amir-Abdollahian said at a news conference in Tehran.

    “If any group or any country is looking to widen this conflict and take advantage of this very unfortunate situation… our advice is: don’t,” he said on the ABC network’s This Week programme.

    US Secretary of State Antony Blinken also mentioned a “likelihood of escalation” from Iranian proxies, such as Hezbollah or Hamas, and said the US was “taking every measure to make sure we can defend” Israelis and US citizens.

    Also on Sunday, Mr Netanyahu paid a visit to troops in northern Israel near the border with Lebanon, which has seen exchanges of fire with Hezbollah since the early days of the conflict.

    And in neighbouring Syria - where Iran has a military presence - Israeli missiles hit Damascus and Aleppo international airports early on Sunday, killing at least two workers, according to Syrian state media.


    The original article contains 549 words, the summary contains 208 words. Saved 62%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • Grant_M@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I warn Iran to tell their terrorist Hamas gang to surrender and free all hostages including the Gazan people.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Iran cares for Gaza in the same way the US cares for Ukraine.

    They don’t, but they’re happy to arm them in order to make their opponent weaker.

      • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Never said it wasn’t. Zachary J. Foster is a Ph.D student in the Near East Studies Department at Princeton University, focusing on the modern Middle East.

        • maegul (he/they)
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yea, sometimes to truly understand an issue, situation or long standing human conversation or culture, there is simply no escaping biased sources all the way to the point where you actually want to seek them out, especially if they themselves do their bias and cause as much “justice” as they can.

          One, because there’s always bias, so trying to escape it is futile to the point of constructing a bias all on its own. Two, because the situation/issue/culture/conversation is the biases, and so if you want to understand it you have to understand the biases of the various parties, to understand the parties themselves and their interactions … right?!

          This isn’t “two-side-ism”, where you stridently presume neutrality and give all sides equal uncritical weight, but rather that you try to understand all sides even when you’re pretty sure you want attack their position as strongly as you can.

          In application, this often manifests in the fact that best way to understand an argument is to study the side you are inclined to disagree with or the side that is stridently in the minority. The general idea is to not try to avoid bias to try to seek it out and characterise it.

        • NewDark@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          Oh, he was on Hasan’s stream recently and did a fantastic job dunking on zionist video.

    • Aleric@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      Debunking Zionist talking points? Looks good to me. Zionists are amongst the most biased, indoctrinated groups I’ve talked to. They make Americans look practically objective.

    • TheDankHold@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      One terrorist attack doesn’t equal a siege. Cutting off supplies and blockading a territory is a siege. Palestinians have been under some for decades now.

      • Allseer@futurology.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        you’re saying palestinians have been denied supplies and have been in a blockade for decades? are you aware that an actually besieged population resorts to cannibalism within a month’s time?

        • TheDankHold@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          When was the last time a Gaza citizen could leave the region without the permission of the Israeli government? Just because the siege is done in a way to maximize good pr doesn’t make the siege non existent.

          The overwhelming majority of available water is non potable and malnutrition is an epidemic there but they are still alive so I guess it’s not actually happening in your eyes.

          Remember when the IDF murdered a bunch of activists for trying to sail in with food and medical supplies on a flotilla? Here’s some info on what happened:

          “According to a UN report, all activist deaths were caused by gunshots, and “the circumstances of the killing of at least six of the passengers were in a manner consistent with an extra-legal, arbitrary and summary execution.””

          This was in 2010 and the blockade hasn’t ceased to exist.

          • Allseer@futurology.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            so you can’t leave then decide to fly on a bicycle to attack for the sake of pr, brilliant nobel peace prize flawless victory please continue

            • TheDankHold@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              What are you referring to here? I think you mistyped.

              Regardless. The average age of a person in Gaza is 18. The percentage of Hamas militants among the population is around 1%. Stop treating the people like a monolith. I know it makes it easy for people to justify atrocities but it’s intellectually lazy.

              These are mostly children that are suffering, born into the iron grip of a fundamentalist regime with zero access education of any kind.

              By all means keep justifying their collective abuse if you want. Just be more honest about what you advocate.