Recently, many of our anti-Zionists posts have been downvoted to oblivion by liberals. As hexberians realized a while back, downvotes only help liberals since they are more numerous and they don’t need to engage in discourse. I am proposing to just get rid of downvotes and instead engage in discourse on content that we disagree on.
I understand that there was an issue with this in Hexbear pre-federation. I’m glad the admins found a solution that works for the site.
The point of this post is that it does matter what happens in the fediverse. This post is about federated downvotes.
I have not said that, you’re putting together a strawman to crybully.
You haven’t shared how your situation in Hexbear (pre-federation, with internal users, and people being downvoted who do not want to spread posts in the fediverse) is relevant to this post (federated downvotes of a user who wants to share posts throughout the fediverse).
You also haven’t shared why it’s your business what Lemmygrad does.
Edit: it looks like you’ve been banned from Lemmygrad
Lemmygrad is a shit instance if they can’t handle basic discussion about trans people being harassed and think the correct decision is to ban the trans people who have an issue.
Your problem isn’t that you’re having an issue with trans people harassed, it’s that you’re assuming that we have the exact same problem Hexbear had in that regard, and arguing that we should remove a major site feature on Lemmygrad because of it when it’s never really been a problem here (largely because the admins are so on top of things), and then basically just accusing everyone here who disagrees with that idea of being transphobic and dunking on them for it when that’s not even close to why people here disagree with the idea
Basically, it’s not that we can’t handle discussion about trans people being harassed, it’s that you’re immediately assuming bad faith of everyone here when it’s rather uncalled for, and people here are pretty experienced at spotting bad faith arguments for reasons that should be obvious
I’ve been here long enough that I have absolutely observed it as a problem here, yes.
Weren’t you the loser that demanded I be ‘respectful’ when I say we should do something about harassment? Have you ever considered that people get angry whenever they suggest, through lived experience, that something decreases harassment, and then you debatelord over it?
Even blahaj can get this shit right, what a fucking joke that you can’t think to be better than a liberal
Do you feel like you’re engaging with me in the way that you’d like to be engaged in?
I quoted the sidebar rules when you were being mean, they’re not my words.
You also haven’t clearly shown how the topic at hand is related to the Hexbear harassment issue, or that it’s an effective fix in a federated space.
It feels like you’re just taking out unrelated anger, to be honest.
The Hexbear harassment situation isn’t what’s happening here.
We’re in the same thread, replying to each other. Except I’m not calling you names.
Edit: seems like you’re ok with downvotes now. Why the change?
awh, are you sad? are you feeling harassed? its almost like they should be removed.
This is the whole point, isn’t it?
The removal of downvotes makes you used to cruel, surface-level, replies.
Now you’ve baited me into a reply that took time and thought, and you can glibly ignore it to insult me.
This is why I don’t want Lemmygrad to become like Hexbear - these interactions hurt my feelings and stress me out.
I get that you’re doing the Hexbear thing of associating me with All That Is Evil, and now you feel comfortable unloading everything on me.
At this point I hope hexbear defederates from lemmygrad. The civility fetishism here is absolutely disgusting.
Good. Now you know even a modicum of what it feels like to stand up against liberals who run in, argue against your lived experience, and shut you down when you get angry over their precious ‘civility’. Now, think about some of the shit I’ve been through. I’ve had to fucking beg gays in LGBT orgs for years to even get an endorsement of a trans organization. Not even funding, not even material support! An endorsement! And when you become indignant when they won’t even do that, of course they are excited to talk down to you about civility. You have no fucking clue how angry civility fetishism makes me. (and for the record, I hate the Human Rights Campaign, their argument was that our area wasnt ready for trans issues to be publicized in any way and were afraid to stick their necks out for us)
Proactive moderation is better than reactive moderation. We should be improving the tools at our disposal to hedge the worst impulses of social media. As a matter of fact, a proactive approach to this conversation to begin with is not to debate me from the outset, but to ask questions and consider what tools would be better than just removing downvotes. There were some people that went into this line of thinking, but its ultimately unsatisfactory (re: keeping downvotes and showing who is downvoting still can make a user aware they are being harassed. it is better remove vectors of harassment and then focus on the core of what makes a community a community, and usually that is comments).
Behold the prudes who desire not to have shit flung at their faces. This cleanliness fetishism is disgusting.
Your demeanor indicates one thing to me. You need to log the fuck off. I’m not trying to be patronizing, you’ve seemingly completely forgotten how to act like someone worth engaging with.
This shit-flinging tantrum is regarding upvotes/downvotes, not whether trans people deserve human rights or not, try to fucking remember that. It ain’t “civility fetishism” when people ask you to explain yourself after calling them losers and bigots. This is little more than wrecker behavior.
Do you want me to insult you? Or is the civility only supposed to go one way?
It feels like you’re treating the Hexbear downvoted removal as if it’s the same as what’s happening here. I don’t see the similarities.
Almost every single post and comment in LG has 1-6 downvotes, from federated instances, always.
Sometimes a bot gets spun up that slams 30-60 downvotes for a day or so, until they get blocked or the instance gets banned.
These users are constantly spinning up new accounts, and trying again. If they weren’t able to do that, what kind of harassment would they move on to?
LG is part of the wider lemmy space, and HB was not (at the time of the downvote removal).
This is a different instance, with different conditions, and if I wanted to have an hb account I would.