minus-squareMighty@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up9·1 year agodamn i just googled the legality and it seems you’re right. i thought the watermarked versions would be fine to use since it’s advertising the site… i guess i hope for “fair use”
minus-squareChe Bananalinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 year agoI would argue that adding your own edit to a stock image would be considered a “parody” of the original, therefore legal to use.
minus-squareRajaGila@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoThe parody argument might actually hold up.
damn i just googled the legality and it seems you’re right. i thought the watermarked versions would be fine to use since it’s advertising the site… i guess i hope for “fair use”
I would argue that adding your own edit to a stock image would be considered a “parody” of the original, therefore legal to use.
The parody argument might actually hold up.
Oof