• fubo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    238
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    As a reminder, Brave was created by the guy who brought you JavaScript and was later fired from Mozilla for donating to hate groups. Brave also profits from multiple forms of fraud including NFTs and affiliate hijacking.

    • hagelslager@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      94
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      If folk want to have a chromium-based browser made by a company, take a look at Vivaldi instead (which will keep the old plugin architecture, so adblockers work). It has a limited built-in blocker and extra features, but for now still runs uBlock.

      • chepox@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I have Vivaldi on my android but I do not know how to get adblock working. Is it even possible?

        Firefox mobile has Ublock Origin and works great. Even on YouTube.

        • Madis@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Menu -> Settings -> Tracker and Ad Blocking -> Block Trackers and Ads

          • chepox@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Thanks. I quickly tried it on YouTube and did get an ad. So I guess it doesn’t work on those. Bummer.

            Edit. Tried it some more and did not get any more ads. It takes a little to get the video playing but other that 10/10. No ad experience. Awesome.

        • sir_reginald@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          it has an adblocker but it doesn’t come even close to uBlock Origin. UBO is so many tiers above any other mobile browser built-in adblocker.

      • CALIGVLA@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        (which will keep the old plugin architecture, so adblockers work).

        Will they? All I remember was them saying that their built-in adblock (which is very barebones) would still work after Manifest v3, nothing much else.

    • Ian@Cambio@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      57
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is misleading. The BAT was a reasonable idea not really a scam.

      • fubo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        60
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’s not just BAT; Brave also supports NFTs, which are even more unambiguously a scam.

        The company is in bed with the cryptocurrency “industry” which cannot exist without constant fraud, ransomware, and other crimes.

  • AphoticDev@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    119
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Just a reminder, one of the largest investors in Brave is a right-wing billionaire who runs a corporate espionage agency that contracts with the US Department of Defense to spy on people.

      • Pfosten@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        64
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Well, it’s about Peter Thiel, who also founded the Palantir surveillance technology company. As a source for his involvement with Brave, Wikipedia cites this TechCrunch article, which mentions funding from Thiel’s “Founders Fund”.

        I’d rather criticize Brave for other reasons though, like being led by Brendan Eich or supporting crypto.

    • Fades@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Wow, I actually had no idea. I haven’t used Brave in awhile now but they’ve been making some strange decisions lately. This makes the picture a little clearer

  • DerisionConsulting@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Just a reminder, Brave was using people’s likenesses to solicit donations without their consent, and without necessarily give those people the donations.

  • ZeroCool@feddit.ch
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Update: Brave plans to address the issue in a future release. The VPN service will only be installed after a user purchases the VPN.

    “Oh gee whiz did we do that?! Woopsie doodle! We’ll fix it someday!”

    Furthermore, no data is sent to Brave from the VPN services. End

    This might be true but the bigger problem is I have exactly zero reason to believe anything Brave says about the things they’re installing on people’s machines without consent. If you’re still using Brave at this point you’re a fool.

    • rckclmbr@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      They’ll either evil or incompetent. Neither of which I want on my computer

      • IdealShrew@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        when did people start hating on Brave? last I heard it was the best browser for privacy.

        • elscallr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          They’re Chromium based, which erodes any possible claim they could make to privacy.

          Use Firefox instead. You can lock it down further than you can Brave and they don’t rely on Google.

          • shortly2139@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Doesn’t Mozilla rely on Google for funding? Genuine question, as I though i read this else where on Lemmy

            • elscallr@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              They might get some money from them but certainly not entirely. There’s an entire Mozilla Foundation.

        • uranibaba@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I never used Brave, but I believe it was sometime after they started their ad-currency-whatever-thingy (I could of course be wrong).

  • Scotty_Trees@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Stop using Brave, jfc. Please use Firefox, it’s not the best, but it’s better than this trash my goodness how many more scandals do people need to get rid of this crap?

    • phx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah the first time I tried Brave it the a bunch of ads for their services - and asking about providing info to their partners - at me constantly. I don’t understand why people use that PoS

  • Fades@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Damn the negative stories just keep coming in regards to Brave. It’s a shame, I liked using their iOS app but I said fuck it awhile ago already. Firefox is my main b rowser

    • LukeMedia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m still not sure what to use on my iPad for adblocking. Someone please tell me what to use instead on iPad! Everything else is Firefox + uBlock Origin, of course.

      • paranoia@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I use Wipr with no complaints so far. If you need free, AdGuard is popular and has a free mode that seems to cover the basics.

      • sir_reginald@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Apple makes it quite difficult. Honestly, I don’t think there’s a good option. Maybe try DNS based adblocking, by either setting your DNS to one that blocks ads or by setting up a Pihole, which gives you more control.

    • elscallr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I used to be a Brave user. I loved it. It worked well, it blocked ads without me asking, whatever. Then Google said they’re gonna bake ad blocker blocking into the API and, knowing Brave was Chromium based, I went back to Mozilla after like 100 years.

      Two observations:

      1. I was kinda deluded

      2. Mozilla got their shit together, Firefox is as awesome again, by comparison, as it was when they unseated Internet Explorer.

  • Pat@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Vivaldi is a better brave. You get built in ad blocking and tracking prevention along with not having built in crypto

    • Clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      And mouse gestures! Configurable tab stacking! Workspaces! Notes and pinned tabs! Tab tiling! Web apps in the sidebar! I love Vivaldi.

      • Clegko@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 year ago

        Remember when Opera had all of these things a literal decade+ ago? I remember.

          • Clegko@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I love Vivaldi, but there’s just something about it’s UI that bothers me. I can’t quite put my finger on it - it just feels slightly off.

        • Clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, I followed their dev over when they left. Opera seems to be a mess these days. I used Opera for over a decade.

    • dangblingus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      There’s no built in crypto anything except for the odd ad on the homepage to buy crypto. Which, sure, is kinda lame, but they don’t mine crypto in the background or anything like that.

  • notannpc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The only chrome variant that doesn’t seem sketchy to install is chromium. The built from open source chromium. And that’s just because some sites barely function unless you’re using chrome’s rendering.

    For everything else, Firefox.

      • notannpc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t know that I’d call that a chromium browser but I’ve only looked at its docs for 10 minutes. Hard to say where chromium integration begins and ends there without digging into the code. Seems like, at most, it’s using the web rendering engine from the chromium project. But it also seems to suggest it has its own modules for executing/rendering js/css/html.

        Probably not included in the “should be avoided” category.

        Now I’m curious what it’s used for.

        • pastermil@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m currently using it in a browser called Falkon. It’s not as big as Firefox or Chrome, but it is endorsed by KDE. Also, Apple’s Safari is using something similar.

          • sir_reginald@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Not at all.

            Safari is using WebKit, which they based on KDE’s old KHTML engine, which is now discontinued.

            Falkon uses qtwebengine which is Chromium’s web engine + integration with QT user interface.

            A Linux browser that uses WebKit (like Safari) is GNOME Web.

  • sebinspace@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    The amount of people I see shilling for Brave like it’s God’s gift to privacy is frankly kind of disturbing given how many issues they’ve had with privacy