• steventhedev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      130
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Performance Improvement Plan. Basically HR collecting evidence so you can’t sue after they fire you.

      • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        91
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah. Just to add, it is ostensibly meant to be a way of going “hey, it looks like your performance is suffering. Maybe this is due to workload, stress, etc. problems. Let’s work together to get you back on track”. But of course it is really a sinister way to invent reasons why someone needs to be fired. Because if you get fired after PIP then HR can say “well we tried our best to help you succeed and you just couldn’t do it”

        They are a way of gaslighting and victim blaming an employee while firing them.

        • Shadow@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          27
          arrow-down
          19
          ·
          1 year ago

          Or they’re a tool to give the employee some quantifiable and measurable areas they need to improve on. This way both sides are clear of expectations and there’s no surprises.

          Not all bosses suck. I’ve had to put a few people on them and they’ve helped, never had to fire someone afterwards.

          • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            28
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s certainly a possibility, but if someone told me they were put on a PIP, and asked me what they should expect, I’d tell them that in all likelihood it means that they are going to be let go in the near future.

            It’s a different story if the company does regular performance management with all employees. For example I work in the public sector and we do annual performance reviews, but also annual performance agreements, which are basically PIPs but without the prerequisite that performance has diminished.

          • idunnololz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            At my previous job I think they actually published stats on pips internally and it was like 50% success rate. I mean it’s not great but the alternative is you just get straight up fired. I think PIP is probably generally a good thing.

            • LemmyIsFantastic@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’ve issued like 10 pips in my time managing I have a 40% success rate. Plenty of companies really do try to make them successful.

            • agent_flounder@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              They literally said “never had to fire anyone”

              But… ok, sure let’s go with your “interpretation”

              • LemmyIsFantastic@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Nah you just don’t get it. Firing is a capitalist invention designed by the elite to keep the population down. Everyone is an excellent employee and every manager everywhere is getting a bonus and poorly utilizing team skills.

      • BoofStroke@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yup. PIP == quit immediately, or at least spend a majority of your work day finding a new job.

      • teejay@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        1 year ago

        From the employee’s perspective, it’s basically an amount of time for you to find a new job while still on the payroll at your current company. There are exceptions, but generally speaking you either won’t survive the PIP, or you will but you’ll be at the top of the list during the next layoffs. And even if you somehow survive all of that, you’re not looking at good raises and career advancement anymore at that company.

        So use it as a runway to the next job and move on.

        • whoisearth@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Buddy of mine survived a PIP and is now one level up. Took a long time but he did it. Sometimes the PIP is related to politics (ie. Asshole “leaders”)

          • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            1 year ago

            There will always be outliers but the general advice is still solid: if you’re on PIP or something similar, you should start the job search immediately. Coming out in a better position is possible but not likely enough to count on.

      • Phen@lemmy.eco.br
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        At my job we had to fire some guy who just never work, but HR out him on PIP first and assigned him to another team at the company. A few weeks later the new team also wanted him gone, so it was time to fire him. Except HR forgot to tell him he was on PIP so he was only moved to another team yet again. This third team wanted him gone even faster than the previoua.

    • DessertStorms@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      In the UK PIP is Personal Independence Payment, which is our disability benefit, which had me really confused, because no fucking way

      A. your boss cares enough (or is even able) to get you on it and

      B. the Department of Work and Pensions would give anyone PIP for “mere” mental health issues (I have multiple disabilities and am declined every time I have to renew my benefit because their default is simply to decline all applications).

      So yeah, “performance improvement plan” makes much more sense lol