• steventhedev@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    130
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Performance Improvement Plan. Basically HR collecting evidence so you can’t sue after they fire you.

    • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      91
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah. Just to add, it is ostensibly meant to be a way of going “hey, it looks like your performance is suffering. Maybe this is due to workload, stress, etc. problems. Let’s work together to get you back on track”. But of course it is really a sinister way to invent reasons why someone needs to be fired. Because if you get fired after PIP then HR can say “well we tried our best to help you succeed and you just couldn’t do it”

      They are a way of gaslighting and victim blaming an employee while firing them.

      • Shadow@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        19
        ·
        1 year ago

        Or they’re a tool to give the employee some quantifiable and measurable areas they need to improve on. This way both sides are clear of expectations and there’s no surprises.

        Not all bosses suck. I’ve had to put a few people on them and they’ve helped, never had to fire someone afterwards.

        • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          28
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s certainly a possibility, but if someone told me they were put on a PIP, and asked me what they should expect, I’d tell them that in all likelihood it means that they are going to be let go in the near future.

          It’s a different story if the company does regular performance management with all employees. For example I work in the public sector and we do annual performance reviews, but also annual performance agreements, which are basically PIPs but without the prerequisite that performance has diminished.

        • idunnololz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          At my previous job I think they actually published stats on pips internally and it was like 50% success rate. I mean it’s not great but the alternative is you just get straight up fired. I think PIP is probably generally a good thing.

          • LemmyIsFantastic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’ve issued like 10 pips in my time managing I have a 40% success rate. Plenty of companies really do try to make them successful.

          • agent_flounder@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            They literally said “never had to fire anyone”

            But… ok, sure let’s go with your “interpretation”

            • LemmyIsFantastic@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Nah you just don’t get it. Firing is a capitalist invention designed by the elite to keep the population down. Everyone is an excellent employee and every manager everywhere is getting a bonus and poorly utilizing team skills.

    • BoofStroke@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yup. PIP == quit immediately, or at least spend a majority of your work day finding a new job.

    • teejay@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      1 year ago

      From the employee’s perspective, it’s basically an amount of time for you to find a new job while still on the payroll at your current company. There are exceptions, but generally speaking you either won’t survive the PIP, or you will but you’ll be at the top of the list during the next layoffs. And even if you somehow survive all of that, you’re not looking at good raises and career advancement anymore at that company.

      So use it as a runway to the next job and move on.

      • whoisearth@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Buddy of mine survived a PIP and is now one level up. Took a long time but he did it. Sometimes the PIP is related to politics (ie. Asshole “leaders”)

        • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          There will always be outliers but the general advice is still solid: if you’re on PIP or something similar, you should start the job search immediately. Coming out in a better position is possible but not likely enough to count on.

    • Phen@lemmy.eco.br
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      At my job we had to fire some guy who just never work, but HR out him on PIP first and assigned him to another team at the company. A few weeks later the new team also wanted him gone, so it was time to fire him. Except HR forgot to tell him he was on PIP so he was only moved to another team yet again. This third team wanted him gone even faster than the previoua.