• Shinhoshi@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    Two points:

    1. IQ is a bad measurement in the first place.
    2. Have they considered less people taking the ACT? Many people don’t have any reason to take it. Do the SAT for comparison.
    • ComradeSalad@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      ACT is not an IQ test though. IQ tests test logic, reasoning, and other metrics. The ACT is a strictly educational test with only minor reasoning portions.

      • Shinhoshi@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Right, but what about who is taking the test?

        If the distribution of test takers is skewed, that could influence numbers like average result…

        • ComradeSalad@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Not many, and mostly those who view the test highly and prepare for it, as it costs a lot of money. There were more students that took it in 2022 as opposed to 2021 (36% vs 35%), but this is down nearly 12% from 2012 when 48% of students took it.

          This is not an issue of applicant pool dilution.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmygrad.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      IQ measurement has lots of well known problems, but it does provide a baseline. If people are having more difficulty doing the same kind of reasoning before and after covid, that’s not a good sign. Meanwhile, the performance is out of students who took the test, it’s not measuring whether more or less people took it. I guess we’ll see if this is also reflected in SAT tests.